microPublication

Get Your Data Out, Be Cited

  • About
    • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Staff
      • Editorial Board
      • Criteria For Publication
      • Publishing Information
      • Data Sharing Policy
    • For Authors
      • Preparation And Submission Of A Manuscript
      • Peer Review Process
      • Following Acceptance
      • Appeals
    • For Reviewers
    • Why micropublish?
  • Submit a microPublication
  • Journals
    • microPublication Biology
      • Editorial Board
  • microPublications
    • Biology
      • Species
        • Arabidopsis
        • C. elegans
        • D. discoideum
        • Drosophila
        • Human
        • Mouse
        • S. cerevisiae
        • S. pombe
        • Xenopus
        • Zebrafish
      • Categories
        • Phenotype Data
        • Methods
        • Expression Data
        • Genotype Data
        • Integrations
        • Genetic Screens
        • Models of Human Disease
        • Software
        • Interaction data
        • Database Updates
        • Electrophysiology Data
        • Phylogenetic Data
        • Science and Society
        • Biochemistry
  • Contact
  • More
    • Archives
    • FAQs
    • Newsletter
microPublication / Biology / The Effect of an Environmentally...
The Effect of an Environmentally Relevant Phthalate Mixture on Primordial Germ Cells of Xenopus laevis Embryos
Nathalie Lancy Momplaisir1, Aurora Turgeon2, Jodi Flaws2 and Jing Yang2
1Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088
2University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 61802
Correspondence to: Jing Yang (yangj@illinois.edu)
Figure 1: A and B. Representative images of pgat in situ hybridization showing pgat-positive PGCs (blue dots) in control and phthalate mixture-treated Xenopus embryos at NF stage 33 & 34. Embryos were treated with phthalate mixture (100 mg/ml) from NF stage 9 (A) and NF stage 14 (B), respectively. C and D. Quantitation of the primordial germ cells in each treatment group. Primordial germ cells were counted from each embryo in each treatment group. The graph shows the abundance of primordial germ cells in embryos exposed to various doses of phthalate mixture from NF stage 9 (C) and NF stage 14 (D). In order to assess the significance of the data, the unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction was used. *** p<0.005. These experiments were performed three times with similar results.

Description

Phthalates, being considered endocrine disrupting chemicals, are estrogen-like and anti-androgenic compounds that interfere with hormones which regulate numerous biological processes, including the maintenance of homeostasis and the regulation of development (Kavlock et al., 1996). Toxicological studies have consistently shown that phthalate metabolites are reproductive and developmental toxicants (Jeng, 2014). Some of the significant complications include fertility issues, decreased anogenital distance, low sperm concentration and motility. While the adverse effects of phthalates on the reproductive system have been well-documented, it is currently unclear if exposure to phthalates affects early stage of germline development.

Xenopus laevis is a widely used vertebrate model system. Xenopus embryos develop quickly and externally, offering numerous advantages for toxicological studies. Previous studies have demonstrated that exposure to specific phthalates, such as DEP and DnPP induces malformations, including edema, abnormal gut, abnormal gut coiling (Gardner et al., 2016). It remains unclear if exposure to phthalates affects the development of primordial germ cells (PGCs), the only type of cells in the embryo capable of giving rise to sperms and oocytes in adult animals.

In this study, the effects of an environmentally relevant phthalate mixture on PGCs of the X. laevis embryos were assessed. The phthalate mixture was formulated according to the exposure levels found in urine metabolites of pregnant women in the Illinois area (Zhou and Flaws, 2017). This phthalate mixture is composed of 21% di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), 35% diethyl phthalate (DEP), 15% dibutyl phthalate (DBP), 8% di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP), 5% benzyl butyl phthalate (BzBP), and 15% di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP). In our study, we treated embryos with various doses of phthalate mixture (1 µg/mL, 10 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL) for 24 hours in two slightly different windows. The first group of embryos were treated with phthalate mixture from Nieuwkoop & Faber (NF) stage 9. At this stage, the genome of developing PGCs remains inactive (Venkatarama et al., 2010). The second group of embryos were exposed to phthalate mixture from NF stage 14, when the genome becomes activated in PGCs (Venkatarama et al., 2010). At NF stage 33 & 34, untreated, vehicle control (DMSO), and phthalate mixture treated embryos were harvested and subjected to whole mount in situ hybridization (WISH) for primordial germ cell-associated transcript protein (pgat, also known as Xpat), a marker for PGCs (Figure 1A and B). After WISH, embryos were cleared in BABB. The number of PGCs in each embryo was counted and statistically analyzed.

Results

This experiment demonstrates that exposure to phthalate mixture from NF stage 9 reduced the number of PGCs in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1C). While the reduction in the 1 µg/mL treatment group was not statistically significant, higher doses of phthalate mixture caused a statistically significant decrease in the number of PGCs (10 µg/ml p=0.0008, and 100 µg/ml p=0.0004). Interestingly, embryos exposed to phthalate mixture from NF stage 14 did not show any reduction in the number of PGCs (Figure 1D). These observations thus suggest that Xenopus PGCs are more sensitive to toxicants such as phthalates during earlier embryonic stages, when the development is controlled by maternal factors. Further work is needed to gain a better understanding of the link between zygotic genome activation and the window of sensitivity to the phthalate mixture during PGC development. It will be of interest to determine if phthalate mixture interferes with the function of Nanos1 or Grip2.1, which regulates the number of PGCs during Xenopus embryonic development (Lai et al., 2012; Tarbashevich et al., 2007).

 

Reagents

Xenopus were purchased from Nasco (www.enasco.com). All Xenopus procedures were approved by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), under animal protocol #17199 and performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Xenopus laevis embryos were obtained and cultured as described (Sive et al., 2000). All phthalates were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (www.sigmaaldrich.com). These include di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP, Cat. No. 36735), diethyl phthalate (DEP, Cat. No. 53008), dibutyl phthalate (DBP, Cat. No. 36736), di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP, Cat. No. 152641), benzyl butyl phthalate (BzBP, Cat. No. 36927), and di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP, Cat. No. 37663). Plasmid for labeling pgat in situ probe was described (Hudson and Woodland, 1998). Whole amount in situ hybridization was performed as described (Rorick et al., 2007).

References

Gardner ST, Wood AT, Lester R, Onkst PE, Burnham N, Perygin DH and Rayburn J (2016) Assessing differences in toxicity and teratogenicity of three phthalates, Diethyl phthalate, Di-n-propyl phthalate, and Di-n-butyl phthalate, using Xenopus laevis embryos. J Toxicol Environ Health A 79:71-82.
10.1080/15287394.2015.1106994 | PubMed
Hudson C and Woodland HR (1998) Xpat, a gene expressed specifically in germ plasm and primordial germ cells of Xenopus laevis. Mech Dev 73:159-68.
PubMed
Jeng HA (2014) Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and male reproductive health. Front Public Health 2:55.
10.3389/fpubh.2014.00055 | PubMed
Kavlock RJ, Daston GP, DeRosa C, Fenner-Crisp P, Gray LE, Kaattari S, Lucier G, Luster M, Mac MJ, Maczka C, Miller R, Moore J, Rolland R, Scott G, Sheehan DM, Sinks T and Tilson HA (1996) Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ Health Perspect 104 Suppl 4:715-40.
10.1289/ehp.96104s4715 | PubMed
Lai F, Singh A and King ML (2012) Xenopus Nanos1 is required to prevent endoderm gene expression and apoptosis in primordial germ cells. Development 139:1476-86.
10.1242/dev.079608 | PubMed
Rorick AM, Mei W, Liette NL, Phiel C, El-Hodiri HM and Yang J (2007) PP2A:B56epsilon is required for eye induction and eye field separation. Dev Biol 302:477-493.
10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.011 | PubMed
Sive H, Grainger R and Harland R (2000) Early Development of Xenopus laevis; A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor. ISBN 978-087969942-0
Tarbashevich K, Koebernick K and Pieler T (2007) XGRIP2.1 is encoded by a vegetally localizing, maternal mRNA and functions in germ cell development and anteroposterior PGC positioning in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 311:554-65.
10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.012 | PubMed
Venkatarama T, Lai F, Luo X, Zhou Y, Newman K and King ML (2010) Repression of zygotic gene expression in the Xenopus germline. Development 137:651-60.
10.1242/dev.038554 | PubMed
Zhou C and Flaws JA (2017) Effects of an Environmentally Relevant Phthalate Mixture on Cultured Mouse Antral Follicles. Toxicol Sci 156:217-229.
10.1093/toxsci/kfw245 | PubMed

Funding

Nathalie Lancy Momplaisir was supported by a fellowship through a grant from National Institute of Health (NIEHS 025059).

Reviewed By

Nanette Nascone-Yoder and Christina Zorn

History

Received: October 31, 2018
Accepted: November 30, 2018
Published: December 3, 2018

Copyright

© 2018 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Momplaisir, NL; Turgeon, A; Flaws, J; Yang, J (2018). The Effect of an Environmentally Relevant Phthalate Mixture on Primordial Germ Cells of Xenopus laevis Embryos. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000080.
Download: RIS BibTeX
microPublication Biology is published by
1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125
The microPublication project is supported by
The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01
microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430