microPublication

Get Your Data Out, Be Cited

  • About
    • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Staff
      • Editorial Board
      • Criteria For Publication
      • Publishing Information
      • Data Sharing Policy
    • For Authors
      • Preparation And Submission Of A Manuscript
      • Peer Review Process
      • Following Acceptance
      • Appeals
    • For Reviewers
    • Why micropublish?
  • Submit a microPublication
  • Journals
    • microPublication Biology
      • Editorial Board
  • microPublications
    • Biology
      • Species
        • Arabidopsis
        • C. elegans
        • D. discoideum
        • Drosophila
        • Human
        • Mouse
        • S. cerevisiae
        • S. pombe
        • Xenopus
        • Zebrafish
      • Categories
        • Phenotype Data
        • Methods
        • Expression Data
        • Genotype Data
        • Integrations
        • Genetic Screens
        • Models of Human Disease
        • Software
        • Interaction data
        • Database Updates
        • Electrophysiology Data
        • Phylogenetic Data
        • Science and Society
        • Biochemistry
  • Contact
  • More
    • Archives
    • FAQs
    • Newsletter
microPublication / Biology / A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces...
A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies Tannic Acid-sensitive mutants
Emily M Pilc1, Shriie Ganesh1 and Oliver Kerscher1
1William & Mary, Biology Department, Williamsburg, VA 23187
Correspondence to: Oliver Kerscher (opkers@wm.edu)
These authors contributed equally.
Figure 1. TA-sensitivity screen of the yeast deletion library and analysis of mutants: A) Schematic of the primary TA sensitivity screen: >5100 strains of the yeast deletion library were grown up in 96-well plates, diluted and spotted to YPD or YPD-TA plates to identify TA-sensitive deletion mutants (red arrows). A TA-sensitive yap1∆ strain was included as a control on each plate (blue arrow). (B) Table with biological process categories of 49 yeast deletion strains identified in the TA-sensitivity screen on YPD-TA media. Individual gene deletions and number (#) in each category are indicated. The gene names in parentheses (indicated by **) identify overlapping genes used for biological process annotation. (C) TA growth assays of select gene deletion strains (shown in blue in table) and a WT control on SC or SC-TA media with 400 or 600µM TA. (D) TA growth assays of select gene deletions and a WT control on SC media with SDS, SDS and TA (400µM), or hydrogen peroxide (3.5µM). (E) TA growth assays of select TA-sensitive deletion strains (aft1∆, grr1∆, vps16∆, vps54∆, snf7∆) and controls (WT, arg1∆, yap1∆) on YPD or YPD-TA media supplemented with indicated concentrations of ferric chloride (FeCl3).

Description

We conducted a genome-wide chemical genetics screen of the yeast MATa knockout collection to identify genes that are required for survival on sub-lethal levels of the polyphenol Tannic Acid (TA) (see Fig 1A and reagents). TA, a plant-derived polymeric form of gallic acid connected to a central glucose core, is known to bind and precipitate proteins (Hagerman and Klucher 1986), chelate iron (ferric ions, Fe3), and form TA-Fe3 films on cells, including yeast (Lee et al. 2020). Addition of TA to cultured prostate cancer cells is reported to induce ER stress, increase markers of the unfolded protein response (UPR), and inhibit lipid metabolism (Nagesh et al. 2020). TA has also been reported to act as a potent but non-toxic SUMO E1 inhibitor in several cell lines (Suzawa et al. 2015). How TA induces these effects remains unknown and, therefore, the genome-wide TA-sensitivity screen may provide insights into underlying genetic pathways involved.

Our initial TA-sensitivity screen of the MATa yeast knockout collection (>5100 strains) netted 49 deletion strains that grew on rich YPD media but showed greatly reduced or no growth on the same media with 400µM TA (Fig 1A). In this screen a TA-sensitive yap1∆ strain (carrying a deletion of the YAP1 transcription factor required for oxidative stress tolerance) and a TA-resistant wildtype strain (BY4741) served as positive and negative controls, respectively. The majority of gene deletions identified in our TA-sensitivity screen fell into 6 categories: Vesicle-mediated transport (30.6%), translational and post-transcriptional regulation (18.4%), cellular stress response (14.3%), chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation (12.2%), cell cycle (8.2%), and catabolic processes (6.1%) (Fig 1B).

It has previously been reported that the sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to TA is due to iron deprivation, but this finding has not been evaluated in the context of specific yeast deletion mutants (Wauters et al. 2011). Therefore, we repeated the growth assay with our 49 TA-sensitive deletion strains on Synthetic Complete (SC) media with and without 400µM TA. SC media contains an almost 50-fold higher ferric chloride concentration [~1200µM] than YPD media [~25µM]. Unexpectedly, most TA-sensitive deletion strains grew similar to the wildtype control on SC and SC-TA media, with 5 notable exceptions discussed in detail below (highlighted in table Fig. 1B and Fig. 1C). First, a aft1∆ deletion strain failed to grow on SC media with both 400 and 600µM TA. Second, grr1∆ and vps16∆ deletions showed a concentration-dependent reduction in growth on 400 and 600µM TA. Third, vps54∆ and snf7∆ deletion strains grew unperturbed on SC with 400 and 600µM TA, but became TA-sensitive when the media was supplemented with 0.01% SDS (Sodium dodecyl sulfate), an ionic detergent. SDS addition alone did not affect growth of these deletion strains and hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2) plates were included as controls to assess oxidative stress tolerance (Fig. 1D).

Next we confirm that increased levels of ferric chloride (FeCl3) permitted growth of the TA-sensitive deletion mutants identified in our assay (Fig. 1C). As expected from our initial screen, aft1∆, grr1∆, vps16∆, vps54∆ and snf7∆ grew robustly on YPD media but showed little or no growth on YPD-TA media (Fig. 1E – left). However, when YPD-TA plates were supplemented with increasing levels of FeCl3 (40-1200µM), growth defects of these 5 TA-sensitive mutants improved in a concentration-dependent manner and no difference to wildtype cells was detected at the highest concentration (1200µM) (Fig. 1E – right). A wildtype strain (WT), the TA-sensitive yap1∆ strain, and a TA-tolerant deletion of the arginosuccinate synthetase (arg1∆), were included as controls. These results indicate that iron depletion is the causative factor for the TA-sensitivity of these yeast deletions.

Iron is an essential element and its depletion affects numerous biological processes. For example, during severe iron deficiency both cellular transcription and translation are repressed (Romero et al. 2020). AFT1 encodes a transcriptional activator that regulates iron uptake and storage genes, which readily explains the TA-sensitivity of the aft1∆ deletion mutant in our screen as it fails to regulate iron homeostasis. Amongst the TA-sensitive mutants aft1∆ is the most sensitive both on SC-TA and YPD-TA media. However, it is currently not clear why addition of FeCl3 rescues the growth defect of aft1∆ on YPD-TA (Fig. 1E) but not SC-TA (Fig. 1C). Therefore, the conclusion that iron supplementation can generally rescue a TA-induced growth defect of aft1∆ is preliminary. Both the aft1∆, as well as the snf7∆ strain, were also previously identified as sensitive to iron depletion from yeast cultures supplemented with BPS (Bathophenanthrolinedisulfonic acid), another iron chelating agent (Jo et al. 2009). Snf7 and Vps16, as well as Vps54, are involved in transport encompassing the golgi, endosomes, and the vacuole, supporting normal function of the vacuole in storage and sequestration of iron and toxic metabolites (Bode et al. 1995; Jo et al. 2009; Zhou et al. 2009). This suggests that either iron sequestration or TA detoxification may be defective in these mutants. However, it is important to note that while TA associates with the surface of yeast cells, there is currently no evidence showing the intracellular uptake of this polyphenol or its metabolites (Lee et al. 2020). Grr1, in contrast, is an F-box substrate adaptor protein of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex and involved in cell cycle progression. Notably, grr1∆ mutants display an abnormal cell shape and exhibit increased sensitivity to osmotic stress (Flick and Johnston 1991). Our observation that low concentrations of SDS exacerbate the effect of TA in the grr1∆ (and our other mutants) may indicate that TA treatment exacerbates membrane integrity defects. There are several reports indicating that TA exposure negatively affects lipid biogenesis and membrane composition (Wauters et al. 2011; Nagesh et al. 2020). Finally, it is important to note that the TA growth phenotype on SC-TA media is similar to those observed on media supplemented with hydrogen peroxide (Fig. 1D), suggesting that oxidative stress and the oxidative damage of proteins and lipids may also play a role in TA’s effect.

In summary, our data shows that TA-sensitivity for the indicated yeast cell mutants can be remedied by ferric chloride supplementation to the growth media (Fig. 1E). This suggests that the 49 yeast deletion mutants identified in our screen fail to cope with TA-induced iron-deficiency stress. Considering TA-mediated iron depletion, there are at least 21 iron-ion binding proteins expressed in yeast that may be affected by reduced iron levels (Cherry et al., 2012). These iron-binding proteins include those required for ribosome biogenesis and function (e.g. RLI1), lipid biogenesis (e.g. SUR2, SCS7, ERG5 etc.), NAD biosynthesis (e.g. BNA1), mitochondrial function (e.g. NFU1), and iron chaperone activity (e.g. YFH1). Thus, TA’s iron-chelating activity in the growth media is likely to exert pleiotropic effects on eukaryotic cell growth which must be taken into account when evaluating studies conducted with this polyphenol.

Methods

Request a detailed protocol

Primary Screen of the Yeast Deletion Library: Individual frozen strains of the yeast deletion strain collection in 96-well format were recovered from cold-storage and grown for 2-3 days as patches on solid YPD media with G418. Cells from individual patches were then inoculated into the corresponding wells of a 96-well plate with 200µl of liquid YPD media and allowed to grow for 2 days at 30°C. Cells were then resuspended, diluted 1:200 in water, and 5µl of each deletion strain was spotted on YPD and YPD-TA (400µM) media. Media plates with cell patches were imaged and data recorded after growing for 5 days at 30°C (see Fig.1A). Secondary Growth Assays: TA-sensitive clones were recovered and tested on the indicated media and with the appropriate controls by spotting 5µl of serially diluted cells (a 10-fold dilution for each spot) from a log phase grown culture. Media plates with colonies were imaged and data recorded after growing for 2-5 days at 30°C (see Fig 1. 1C-E). Biological Process information was assigned using information from www.yeastgenome.org (Cherry et al., 2012) and Panther GO slim (pantherdb.org).

Reagents

Yeast were grown and assayed at 30°C in YPD or synthetic-complete (SC) growth media with the stated additions (Guthrie and Fink 2004). Yeast nitrogen base for SC media was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Y0626). G418 (USBiological G1000) was added to 200µg/ml to select for individual KANMX4-marked gene deletion strains in the MATa knockout collection (Giaever et al. 2002). Strain genotype for the MATa deletion collection is: BY4741 MATa his3∆1 leu2∆0 met15∆0 ura3∆0) (Brachmann et al. 1998). Yeast deletion strains are available at https://horizondiscovery.com. Tannic Acid (TA) (Sigma-Aldrich 403040) was dissolved in water to 100mM and diluted in pre-warmed YPD or SC media at the indicated concentrations before pouring. FeCl3 was dissolved in water to 100mM and added to media at the indicated concentrations and before adding TA. Where indicated, hydrogen peroxide was diluted into media from a commercial stock to 3.5µM. SDS was diluted into media from a 20% stock in water to 0.01%.

Acknowledgments

We like to thank all members of the Kerscher lab at W&M for their support and Dr. Randy Chambers’ lab for generously sharing a reagent.

References

Bode HP, Dumschat M, Garotti S, Fuhrmann GF. 1995. Iron sequestration by the yeast vacuole. A study with vacuolar mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem 228: 337-42.
PubMed
Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115-32.
PubMed
Flick JS, Johnston M. 1991. GRR1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for glucose repression and encodes a protein with leucine-rich repeats. Mol Cell Biol 11: 5101-12.
PubMed
Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Véronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, André B, Arkin AP, Astromoff A, El-Bakkoury M, Bangham R, Benito R, Brachat S, Campanaro S, Curtiss M, Davis K, Deutschbauer A, Entian KD, Flaherty P, Foury F, Garfinkel DJ, Gerstein M, Gotte D, Güldener U, Hegemann JH, Hempel S, Herman Z, Jaramillo DF, Kelly DE, Kelly SL, Kötter P, LaBonte D, Lamb DC, Lan N, Liang H, Liao H, Liu L, Luo C, Lussier M, Mao R, Menard P, Ooi SL, Revuelta JL, Roberts CJ, Rose M, Ross-Macdonald P, Scherens B, Schimmack G, Shafer B, Shoemaker DD, Sookhai-Mahadeo S, Storms RK, Strathern JN, Valle G, Voet M, Volckaert G, Wang CY, Ward TR, Wilhelmy J, Winzeler EA, Yang Y, Yen G, Youngman E, Yu K, Bussey H, Boeke JD, Snyder M, Philippsen P, Davis RW, Johnston M. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-91.
PubMed
Guthrie C, Fink GR. Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology. 2004. San Diego: Elsevier.
Hagerman AE, Klucher KM. 1986. Tannin-protein interactions. Prog Clin Biol Res 213: 67-76.
PubMed
Jo WJ, Kim JH, Oh E, Jaramillo D, Holman P, Loguinov AV, Arkin AP, Nislow C, Giaever G, Vulpe CD. 2009. Novel insights into iron metabolism by integrating deletome and transcriptome analysis in an iron deficiency model of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 10: 130.
PubMed
Lee H, Park J, Han SY, Han S, Youn W, Choi H, Yun G, Choi IS. 2020. Ascorbic acid-mediated reductive disassembly of Fe3+-tannic acid shells in degradable single-cell nanoencapsulation. Chem Commun (Camb) 56: 13748-13751.
PubMed
Nagesh PKB, Chowdhury P, Hatami E, Jain S, Dan N, Kashyap VK, Chauhan SC, Jaggi M, Yallapu MM. 2020. Tannic acid inhibits lipid metabolism and induce ROS in prostate cancer cells. Sci Rep 10: 980.
PubMed
Cherry JM, Hong EL, Amundsen C, Balakrishnan R, Binkley G, Chan ET, Christie KR, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Engel SR, Fisk DG, Hirschman JE, Hitz BC, Karra K, Krieger CJ, Miyasato SR, Nash RS, Park J, Skrzypek MS, Simison M, Weng S, Wong ED. 2012. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D700-5.
PubMed
Romero AM, Ramos-Alonso L, Alepuz P, Puig S, Martínez-Pastor MT. 2020. Global translational repression induced by iron deficiency in yeast depends on the Gcn2/eIF2α pathway. Sci Rep 10: 233.
PubMed
Suzawa M, Miranda DA, Ramos KA, Ang KK, Faivre EJ, Wilson CG, Caboni L, Arkin MR, Kim YS, Fletterick RJ, Diaz A, Schneekloth JS, Ingraham HA. 2015. A gene-expression screen identifies a non-toxic sumoylation inhibitor that mimics SUMO-less human LRH-1 in liver. Elife 4: .
PubMed
Wauters T, Iserentant D, Verachtert H. 2001. Sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to tannic acid is due to iron deprivation. Can J Microbiol 47: 290-3.
PubMed
Zhou X, Arita A, Ellen TP, Liu X, Bai J, Rooney JP, Kurtz AD, Klein CB, Dai W, Begley TJ, Costa M. 2009. A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals pathways affected by arsenic toxicity. Genomics 94: 294-307.
PubMed

Funding

Funding for this project was made available through the Bailey-Huston Research Fund to the Kerscher lab and W&M Biology Ferguson Awards to EP and SG.

Author Contributions

Emily M Pilc: Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing, Validation
Shriie Ganesh: Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing
Oliver Kerscher: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Reviewed By

John Choy

History

Received: December 22, 2020
Revision received: January 12, 2021
Accepted: January 14, 2021
Published: January 14, 2021

Copyright

© 2021 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Pilc, EM; Ganesh, S; Kerscher, O (2021). A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies Tannic Acid-sensitive mutants. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000358.
Download: RIS BibTeX
microPublication Biology is published by
1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125
The microPublication project is supported by
The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01
microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430