microPublication

Get Your Data Out, Be Cited

  • About
    • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Staff
      • Editorial Board
      • Criteria For Publication
      • Publishing Information
      • Data Sharing Policy
    • For Authors
      • Preparation And Submission Of A Manuscript
      • Peer Review Process
      • Following Acceptance
      • Appeals
    • For Reviewers
    • Why micropublish?
  • Submit a microPublication
  • Journals
    • microPublication Biology
      • Editorial Board
  • microPublications
    • Biology
      • Species
        • Arabidopsis
        • C. elegans
        • D. discoideum
        • Drosophila
        • Human
        • Mouse
        • S. cerevisiae
        • S. pombe
        • Xenopus
        • Zebrafish
      • Categories
        • Phenotype Data
        • Methods
        • Expression Data
        • Genotype Data
        • Integrations
        • Genetic Screens
        • Models of Human Disease
        • Software
        • Interaction data
        • Database Updates
        • Electrophysiology Data
        • Phylogenetic Data
        • Science and Society
        • Biochemistry
  • Contact
  • More
    • Archives
    • FAQs
    • Newsletter
microPublication / Biology / The S1A protease family members...
The S1A protease family members CG10764 and CG4793 regulate cellular immunity in Drosophila
Pooja KR1, Jonathan Lee1 and Nathan T Mortimer1
1School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University
Correspondence to: Nathan T Mortimer (ntmorti@ilstu.edu)

Abstract

In nature, Drosophila melanogaster larvae are infected by parasitoid wasps and mount a cellular immune response to this infection. Several conserved signaling pathways have been implicated in coordinating this response, however our understanding of the integration and regulation of these pathways is incomplete. Members of the S1A serine protease family have been previously linked to immune functions, and our findings suggest roles for two S1A family members, CG10764 and CG4793 in the cellular immune response to parasitoid infection.

Figure 1. Characterization of S1A serine protease family members in fly cellular immunity: Box plots showing the proportion of wasp eggs encapsulated following infection by the avirulent wasp Leptopilina clavipes when the indicated genes are knocked down by RNA interference (RNAi) in (A) lamellocytes or (B) plasmatocytes. For these experiments, we crossed immune cell GAL4 males to the indicated UAS-RNAi genotype females, and the resulting offspring were infected and assayed for the proportion of parasitoid eggs that were encapsulated. Two independent UAS-RNAi lines were used for each gene. (A) RNAi knock down in lamellocytes using msn-GAL4. Knocking down CG10764 in lamellocytes significantly reduced the encapsulation rate. Conversely, knockdown of CG4793 in lamellocytes resulted in a significant increase in the encapsulation rate. (B) RNAi knock down in plasmatocytes using eater-GAL4. Knocking down CG10764 in plasmatocytes resulted in a significant reduction in the encapsulation rate. RNAi knock down of CG4793 in plasmatocytes had no effect. Plots show quartile data with the box giving the interquartile range and whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum. The median is indicated by a solid line. *indicates p value < 0.05 compared to the control genotypes, UAS-GAL4RNAi-1 for the first set of RNAi lines (UAS-CG10764GL01210,UAS-CG4793HMC03765) and UAS-GAL4RNAi-2 for the second set of RNAi lines (UAS-CG10764NIG.10764R,UAS- CG4793NIG.4793R) by Dunnett’s test.

Description

Cellular immune responses are an important aspect of innate host defense against infection and are broadly conserved from insects to mammals. The model organism Drosophila melanogaster uses the cellular encapsulation response to protect against macroparasite infection (Carton et al., 2008; Mortimer, 2013). This response shows genetic conservation with human immune responses (Howell et al., 2012), and may serve as a useful model to better understand human immune cell functions. Drosophila larvae are commonly infected by parasitoid wasps and following infection mount a cellular immune response to kill the parasite. This response is mediated by two cell types, circulating macrophage-like immune cells known as plasmatocytes and infection-induced immune cells called lamellocytes (Honti et al., 2014; Rizki, 1957). Plasmatocytes operate as the first line responders to infection by recognizing and binding to the wasp egg (Mortimer et al., 2012; Russo et al., 1996). This process is then followed by the production of lamellocytes that form a consolidated multi-layered capsule, thereby killing the wasp (Kim-Jo et al., 2019; Russo et al., 1996). Recent findings have begun to elucidate the regulation of the encapsulation response in Drosophila, including a role for the evolutionarily conserved JAK-STAT signaling pathway (Sorrentino et al. 2004; Yang et al. 2015). The roles of JAK-STAT signaling are not completely understood, but the pathway has been linked to the production of lamellocytes (Bausek and Zeidler, 2014; Hanratty and Dearolf, 1993; Luo et al., 1995, 1997; Sorrentino et al., 2004).

Members of the S1A protease family are involved in many physiological processes, including the regulation of invertebrate immune responses (Cao and Jiang, 2018). In Drosophila, the S1A family is composed of more than 200 genes and includes the catalytically active serine proteases (SPs) and the serine protease homologs (SPHs), a group of SP-like proteins that are enzymatically inactive (Cao and Jiang, 2018). Many S1A family members have been linked to the antimicrobial immune response including the SP genes spirit, grass, psh and SPE, and the SPH genes sphe, sphinx1 and sphinx2 (Buchon et al., 2009; El Chamy et al., 2008; Kambris et al., 2006; Ligoxygakis et al., 2002; Patrnogic and Leclerc, 2017). However, the role of SP and SPH genes in regulating the fly antiparasitoid immune response is still not well-defined.

A recent study of transcriptional targets of JAK-STAT pathway activity showed that the S1A family members, the SP gene CG10764 (also known as SP77) and the SPH gene CG4793 (also known as cSPH128) are JAK-STAT pathway target genes (Bina et al., 2010). The JAK-STAT pathway is important for the production of lamellocytes following parasitoid infection (Sorrentino et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2015), and ectopic pathway activity leads to tumorigenesis as characterized by the precocious accumulation of lamellocytes (Ekas et al., 2010; Harrison et al., 1995). RNA interference (RNAi) mediated knock down of CG10764 and CG4793 in the JAK-STAT tumor model suggested that these genes may play antagonistic roles in regulating JAK-STAT signaling and lamellocyte production (Bina et al., 2010).

To evaluate the functional roles of these JAK-STAT regulated S1A family members in fly cellular immunity, we used two different RNAi lines with unique sequence targets to knock down each gene in both the plasmatocyte (using eater-GAL4) (Tokusumi et al. 2009a) and lamellocyte (using msn-GAL4) (Lam, et al. 2010; Tokusumi et al. 2009b) immune cell types and compared their ability to encapsulate parasitoid wasp eggs following infection. We find that knocking down CG10764 with either of the RNAi lines in lamellocytes (Figure 1A; UAS-CG10764GL01210: p= 0.00222, nEXP = 73, nCTRL = 72; UAS-CG10764NIG.10764R: p=0.0112, nEXP = 71 , nCTRL = 67) or plasmatocytes (Figure 1B; UAS-CG10764GL01210: p= 0.000955, nEXP = 75, nCTRL = 81 ; UAS-CG10764NIG.10764R: p= 1.74e-06, nEXP = 57 , nCTRL = 62) results in a significant reduction in the proportion of wasp eggs that are successfully encapsulated. These findings suggest that CG10764 may act as a positive regulator of encapsulation in both fly immune cell types. Conversely, RNAi-mediated knock down of CG4793 in lamellocytes with either of the RNAi lines results in a significant increase in encapsulation rate (Figure 1A; UAS-CG4793HMC03765: p= 1.09e- 05, nEXP, = 80, nCTRL = 72 ; UAS- CG4793NIG.4793R : p= 0.0098, nEXP, = 60, nCTRL = 67), but has no effect when knocked down in plasmatocytes (Figure 1B; UAS-CG4793HMC03765 : p= 0.56975, nEXP,=57, nCTRL =62 ; UAS- CG4793NIG.4793R : p= 0.321 , nEXP, = 57 , nCTRL = 62). This suggests that CG4793 may act as a negative regulator of encapsulation specifically in lamellocytes, the immune cell subtype that is induced following infection.

Based on our observations, we hypothesize that CG10764 and CG4793 play important and distinct roles in balancing immune activation. CG10764 appears to regulate the initiation of pro-immune signaling which triggers the host immune response against parasitoid infection. CG10764 likely encodes an active serine protease, and may influence immune activation through the direct cleavage of target proteins. On the other hand, CG4793 appears to be responsible for limiting the immune response when the defense mechanism is elicited. This is an important role which allows the host to avoid self-directed immune damage due to an overreactive immune system. CG4793 is an SPH gene and encodes a protein that is predicted to be catalytically inactive. However, these SPH proteins play regulatory roles in a variety of processes (Cao and Jiang, 2018), and it is likely that CG4793 is acting through a similar mechanism to limit immune activity. Thus, these S1A family members likely have cell-specific roles and regulate the cellular encapsulation process through distinct mechanisms.

A role for CG10764 and CG4793 in modulating JAK-STAT pathway activity has been previously demonstrated (Bina et al., 2010). Interestingly, these S1A family members were also shown to have opposing effects on the phenotype seen in hopTum flies, which display a melanotic phenotype due to ectopic JAK-STAT signaling (Bina et al., 2010; Hanratty and Dearolf, 1993; Luo et al., 1995). Here we show that CG10764 and CG4793 may also act antagonistically to maintain a balanced immune response and based on these previous studies, we hypothesize that this could potentially be via regulation of JAK-STAT signaling. However, a detailed mechanistic understanding of how these S1A family genes regulate cellular immunity and how their activity may be linked to JAK-STAT pathway signaling remain to be established. Additionally, further research into the human homologs of CG10764 and CG4793 may reveal conserved functions in human immunity and JAK-STAT mediated disease.

Methods

Request a detailed protocol

Drosophila genetics. Tissue-specific modulation of gene expression can be achieved in D. melanogaster using the yeast-derived UAS-GAL4 system. GAL4 is a transcription factor that binds to the UAS enhancer sequence present in the promoter region controlling expression of the gene of interest (Brand and Perrimon, 1993). We used hemocyte specific GAL4 lines and two UAS-RNAi lines with distinct target sequences to knock down the genes of interest in each hemocyte type. UAS-GAL4RNAi was used as the control genotype. Independent control experiments were run with each UAS-RNAi experiment; UAS-GAL4RNAi-1 refers to the control replicates for experiments with the UAS-CG4793HMC03765 and UAS-CG10764GL01210 constructs and UAS-GAL4RNAi-2 refers to the control replicates for experiments with the UAS-CG10764NIG.10764R and UAS- CG4793NIG.4793R constructs. All Drosophila crosses were maintained on standard Drosophila medium (Molasses Formulation, Genesee Scientific) at 25C° on a 12 hour light:dark cycle.

Parasitoid wasp infection. For each genotype tested, approximately 25 virgin female GAL4 flies were mated with 10 UAS-RNAi line males. These crosses were transferred to egg lay chambers containing grape-juice plates (Genesee Scientific) supplemented with yeast paste and allowed to lay for 72 hours. For infection experiments, 25 F1 second instar larvae were picked from the egg lay plates and transferred into small petri dishes with standard Drosophila medium (Molasses Formulation, Genesee Scientific) together with 3 female LcNet wasps. All of the surviving larvae (~25/infection plate) were dissected 72 hours post infection and the number of encapsulated wasp eggs and live wasp larvae were counted. Each genotype for each experiment was performed in triplicate. All experimental crosses and infections were carried out at 25°C.

Encapsulation rate. After a 72 hour wasp exposure, larvae from each plate were dissected and scored for the presence of an encapsulated wasp egg or live wasp larva, to assay the encapsulation rate.

Data analysis and statistics. To analyze the effect of knockdown of proteases on wasp egg encapsulation rate, we used generalized linear models with quasibinomial errors to test for an effect of genotype, and then we performed Dunnett’s post hoc tests to compare each of the experimental genotypes to the control genotype. All statistics were done in the R statistical computing environment (R Core Team, 2020) using the “multcomp” (Hothorn et al., 2008), “plyr” package (Wickham, 2011). Graphs were produced using the “ggplot2” package (Wickham, 2009).

Reagents

The following Drosophila melanogaster stocks were used in this experiment:

UAS-RNAi lines:

Short Genotype Full Genotype Stock ID
UAS-CG4793HMC03765 y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.GL01210}attP40 BDSC:41628
UAS-CG10764GL01210 y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]= TRiP. HMC03765}attP40 BDSC:41628
UAS-GAL4RNAi y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=VALIUM20-GAL4.1}attP2 BDSC:35784
UAS-CG10764NIG.10764R P{NIG.10764R} NIG:10764R-1
UAS- CG4793NIG.4793R P{NIG.4793R} NIG:4793R-1

GAL4 lines (provided by Robert Schulz, University of Notre Dame):

Genotype (FlyBase ID) Expression Reference
eater217-GAL4 (FBtp0057112) Plasmatocytes (Tokusumi et al. 2009a)
msn-GAL4 (FBtp0083721) Lamellocytes (Lam et al. 2010; Tokusumi et al. 2009b)

We additionally used the figitid parasitoid wasp species Leptopilina clavipes (strain LcNet) (Mortimer et al. 2012) reared in the lab on Drosophila virilis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Mortimer lab for discussion of the project, and Robert Schulz and Tsuyoshi Tokusumi for providing Drosophila stocks. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (Bloomington, IN, USA) (NIH P40OD018537) and the National Institute of Genetics Fly Stock Center (Mishima, Japan) were used in this study.

References

Bausek N, Zeidler MP. 2014. Gα73B is a downstream effector of JAK/STAT signalling and a regulator of Rho1 in Drosophila haematopoiesis. J Cell Sci 127: 101-10.
PubMed
Bina S, Wright VM, Fisher KH, Milo M, Zeidler MP. 2010. Transcriptional targets of Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway signalling as effectors of haematopoietic tumour formation. EMBO Rep 11: 201-7.
PubMed
Brand AH, Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-15.
PubMed
Buchon N, Poidevin M, Kwon HM, Guillou A, Sottas V, Lee BL, Lemaitre B. 2009. A single modular serine protease integrates signals from pattern-recognition receptors upstream of the Drosophila Toll pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 12442-7.
PubMed
Cao X, Jiang H. 2018. Building a platform for predicting functions of serine protease-related proteins in Drosophila melanogaster and other insects. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 103: 53-69.
PubMed
Carton Y, Poirié M, Nappi AJ. 2008. Insect immune resistance to parasitoids. Insect Sci 15: 67–87.
10.1111/j.1744-7917.2008.00188.x
Ekas LA, Cardozo TJ, Flaherty MS, McMillan EA, Gonsalves FC, Bach EA. 2010. Characterization of a dominant-active STAT that promotes tumorigenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 344: 621-36.
PubMed
El Chamy L, Leclerc V, Caldelari I, Reichhart JM. 2008. Sensing of 'danger signals' and pathogen-associated molecular patterns defines binary signaling pathways 'upstream' of Toll. Nat Immunol 9: 1165-70.
PubMed
Hanratty WP, Dearolf CR. 1993. The Drosophila Tumorous-lethal hematopoietic oncogene is a dominant mutation in the hopscotch locus. Mol Gen Genet 238: 33-7.
PubMed
Harrison DA, Binari R, Nahreini TS, Gilman M, Perrimon N. 1995. Activation of a Drosophila Janus kinase (JAK) causes hematopoietic neoplasia and developmental defects. EMBO J 14: 2857-65.
PubMed
Honti V, Csordás G, Kurucz É, Márkus R, Andó I. 2014. The cell-mediated immunity of Drosophila melanogaster: hemocyte lineages, immune compartments, microanatomy and regulation. Dev Comp Immunol 42: 47-56.
PubMed
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50: 346-63.
PubMed
Howell L, Sampson CJ, Xavier MJ, Bolukbasi E, Heck MM, Williams MJ. 2012. A directed miniscreen for genes involved in the Drosophila anti-parasitoid immune response. Immunogenetics 64: 155-61.
PubMed
Kambris Z, Brun S, Jang IH, Nam HJ, Romeo Y, Takahashi K, Lee WJ, Ueda R, Lemaitre B. 2006. Drosophila immunity: a large-scale in vivo RNAi screen identifies five serine proteases required for Toll activation. Curr Biol 16: 808-13.
PubMed
Kim-Jo C, Gatti JL, Poirié M. 2019. Drosophila Cellular Immunity Against Parasitoid Wasps: A Complex and Time-Dependent Process. Front Physiol 10: 603.
PubMed
Lam VK, Tokusumi T, Cerabona D, Schulz RA. 2010. Specific cell ablation in Drosophila using the toxic viral protein M2(H37A). Fly (Austin) 4: 338-43.
PubMed
Ligoxygakis P, Pelte N, Hoffmann JA, Reichhart JM. 2002. Activation of Drosophila Toll during fungal infection by a blood serine protease. Science 297: 114-6.
PubMed
Luo H, Hanratty WP, Dearolf CR. 1995. An amino acid substitution in the Drosophila hopTum-l Jak kinase causes leukemia-like hematopoietic defects. EMBO J 14: 1412-20.
PubMed
Luo H, Rose P, Barber D, Hanratty WP, Lee S, Roberts TM, D'Andrea AD, Dearolf CR. 1997. Mutation in the Jak kinase JH2 domain hyperactivates Drosophila and mammalian Jak-Stat pathways. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1562-71.
PubMed
Mortimer NT. 2013. Parasitoid wasp virulence: A window into fly immunity. Fly (Austin) 7: 242-8.
PubMed
Mortimer NT, Kacsoh BZ, Keebaugh ES, Schlenke TA. 2012. Mgat1-dependent N-glycosylation of membrane components primes Drosophila melanogaster blood cells for the cellular encapsulation response. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002819.
PubMed
Patrnogic J, Leclerc V. 2017. The serine protease homolog spheroide is involved in sensing of pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria. PLoS One 12: e0188339.
PubMed
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Rizki MTM. 1957. Alterations in the haemocyte population of Drosophila melanogaster. J Morphol 100: 437–458.
10.1002/jmor.1051000303
Russo J, Dupas S, Frey F, Carton Y, Brehelin M. 1996. Insect immunity: early events in the encapsulation process of parasitoid (Leptopilina boulardi) eggs in resistant and susceptible strains of Drosophila. Parasitology 112 ( Pt 1): 135-42.
PubMed
Sorrentino RP, Melk JP, Govind S. 2004. Genetic analysis of contributions of dorsal group and JAK-Stat92E pathway genes to larval hemocyte concentration and the egg encapsulation response in Drosophila. Genetics 166: 1343-56.
PubMed
Tokusumi T, Shoue DA, Tokusumi Y, Stoller JR, Schulz RA. 2009a. New hemocyte-specific enhancer-reporter transgenes for the analysis of hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Genesis 47: 771-4.
PubMed
Tokusumi T, Sorrentino RP, Russell M, Ferrarese R, Govind S, Schulz RA. 2009b. Characterization of a lamellocyte transcriptional enhancer located within the misshapen gene of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 4: e6429.
PubMed
Wickham H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (New York: Springer-Verlag).
10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3
Wickham H. 2011. The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. J Stat Softw 40: 1–29.
10.18637/jss.v040.i01
Yang H, Kronhamn J, Ekström JO, Korkut GG, Hultmark D. 2015. JAK/STAT signaling in Drosophila muscles controls the cellular immune response against parasitoid infection. EMBO Rep 16: 1664-72.
PubMed

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R35GM133760 to NTM, and a Grant-in-Aid of Research from the National Academy of Sciences administered by Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society to PKR.

Author Contributions

Pooja KR: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review and editing, Funding acquisition
Jonathan Lee: Investigation, Validation
Nathan T Mortimer: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Reviewed By

Anonymous

History

Received: August 26, 2020
Revision received: January 14, 2021
Accepted: February 11, 2021
Published: February 22, 2021

Copyright

© 2021 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

KR, P; Lee, J; Mortimer, NT (2021). The S1A protease family members CG10764 and CG4793 regulate cellular immunity in Drosophila. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000370.
Download: RIS BibTeX
microPublication Biology is published by
1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125
The microPublication project is supported by
The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01
microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430