microPublication

Get Your Data Out, Be Cited

  • About
    • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Staff
      • Editorial Board
      • Criteria For Publication
      • Publishing Information
      • Data Sharing Policy
    • For Authors
      • Preparation And Submission Of A Manuscript
      • Peer Review Process
      • Following Acceptance
      • Appeals
    • For Reviewers
    • Why micropublish?
  • Submit a microPublication
  • Journals
    • microPublication Biology
      • Editorial Board
  • microPublications
    • Biology
      • Species
        • Arabidopsis
        • C. elegans
        • D. discoideum
        • Drosophila
        • Human
        • Mouse
        • S. cerevisiae
        • S. pombe
        • Xenopus
        • Zebrafish
      • Categories
        • Phenotype Data
        • Methods
        • Expression Data
        • Genotype Data
        • Integrations
        • Genetic Screens
        • Models of Human Disease
        • Software
        • Interaction data
        • Database Updates
        • Electrophysiology Data
        • Phylogenetic Data
        • Science and Society
        • Biochemistry
  • Contact
  • More
    • Archives
    • FAQs
    • Newsletter
microPublication / Biology / Exposing a novel genetic interaction...
Exposing a novel genetic interaction between unc-33/CRMP and hmp-2/β-catenin during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis
John Garzanelli1 and Stephanie Maiden1
1Biology Department, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO, 63501
Correspondence to: Stephanie Maiden (smaiden@truman.edu)
Figure 1. Percentage of embryos that failed to hatch after feeding RNAi knockdown in wildtype (A) or unc-33(e204) homozygous animals (B): Box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. Horizontal bars indicate the medians, asterisks indicate the means, and polygons represent density estimates of data and extend to extreme values. From left to right in the plot, n=24, 23, 24, 23, 23, 24, where each n is the percentage that failed to hatch from a single hermaphrodite. Standard deviations from left to right are 4.8, 14.8, 4.3, 19.2, 18.4, 30.9.

Description

Microtubules are critical to a number of vital cellular processes, including cell division, intracellular transport, cell movement, and cell structure. Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) facilitate these various microtubule functions by regulating dynamic instability, crosslinking, and trafficking, among others (Alfaro-Aco and Petry 2015). There are over 60 conserved MAPs in Caenorhabditis elegans, many with essential functions (Oegema 2006; Lacroix et al. 2014; Rose and Gonczy 2014; Quintin et al. 2016). Not surprisingly, microtubules and MAPs are required during early Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis when cell divisions predominate (Oegema 2006; Rose and Gonczy 2014). Temporally-controlled microtubule disruption by either drugs or transgenic constructs can bypass these early requirements and have shown that microtubules are also necessary for proper epidermal morphogenesis during mid-embryonic development (Williams-Masson et al. 1998; Quintin et al. 2016). However, it is still unclear what complement of MAPs function during this stage of development to pattern the overall microtubule network and control dynamic instability.

C. elegans UNC-33 is an ortholog to collapsin response mediator proteins (CRMPs), a family thought to regulate the dynamic instability of microtubules (Li et al. 1992; Fukata et al. 2002; Tsuboi et al. 2005; Lin et al. 2011). Mutants of unc-33 exhibit defects in axonal outgrowth and guidance, resulting in paralysis and locomotor defects (Hedgecock et al. 1985; Li et al. 1992). The dendrites of sensory neurons in these animals have far more microtubules than in wildtype and they are often larger in diameter with other structural defects (Hedgecock et al. 1985). In addition to these neuronal effects, homozygous mutant animals of the classic allele, unc-33(e204), also appear shorter and stouter than wildtype animals. While some Dumpy animals are caused by mutations in genes important for cuticle development (Kusch and Edgar 1986), others are caused by mutations in genes important for embryonic epidermal morphogenesis, such as sma-1 (McKeown et al. 1998; Praitis et al. 2005), let-502 (Piekny et al. 2000; Gally et al. 2009; Quintin et al. 2016), and lin-26 (Ferguson and Horvitz 1985). Two other C. elegans gene products, DHP-1 and DHP-2, are almost 70% identical in sequence with UNC-33 and are also evolutionarily related to vertebrate CRMPs (Takemoto et al. 2000). In situ hybridization showed dhp-1 mRNA in hypodermal cells from late gastrula to at least 2-fold body elongation, and a GFP-tagged version of DHP-1 was also expressed in the larval hypodermis (Takemoto et al. 2000). There are currently no associated phenotypes to dhp-1, so we hypothesized that UNC-33 and DHP-1 may be functionally redundant in the epidermis during C. elegans embryogenesis.

To determine if any functional redundancy exists between UNC-33 and DHP-1, we used unc-33(e204) homozygous animals as a sensitized background and disrupted dhp-1 expression by feeding RNA interference (RNAi). Because we were specifically interested in potential embryonic effects, we scored the number of embryos that failed to hatch and took this as a percentage of the total progeny (Figure 1). When analyzed by two-way ANOVA, a significant interaction was found between the strains and gene knockdowns (p=2.761e-07). We used post-hoc Tukey’s honest significant test to make all pairwise comparisons; this revealed which of the gene knockdowns interacted with unc-33(e204) mutants. As expected for a negative control, the empty feeding vector (L4440) fed to either wildtype or unc-33(e204) homozygous animals showed a low level of lethality, 3.4% and 9.3% on average, respectively. These data were not significantly different from each other in a pairwise comparison (p=0.872). In wildtype animals, the positive control, hmp-2(RNAi), resulted in 17.9% of embryos that failed to hatch but this was not found to be significantly different to the L4440 control (p=0.068). It is important to note, however, that less than 1% of hatched hmp-2(RNAi) animals were normal larva; the vast majority were Hmp with severe body morphology defects. Surprisingly, unc-33(e204);hmp-2(RNAi) resulted in 65.3% of embryos that failed to hatch, a significant increase compared to both the negative control in the same strain and hmp-2(RNAi) in wildtype (p < 0.001 for both). In both wildtype and unc-33(e204) homozygous animals, knockdown of dhp-1 did not significantly alter the percent of embryos that failed to hatch (3.1% and 19.5%, respectively).

Our hypothesis regarding UNC-33 and DHP-1 was unfortunately not supported by this experiment. While unc-33(e204) is considered the reference allele, it is also a weak loss-of-function (Tsuboi et al. 2005) and may still provide enough UNC-33 activity to obscure any redundancy with DHP-1 that might be revealed by dhp-1 knockdown. The unexpected interaction between hmp-2 and unc-33 is intriguing, however, given that our hypothesis focused on the role of UNC-33 and DHP-1 in the embryonic epidermis. Knockdown of hmp-2/β-catenin by feeding RNAi was chosen as a positive control because of the reproducible embryonic and larval phenotypes in wildtype. The embryonic lethality and body morphology defects from hmp-2(RNAi) are due to the essential role of HMP-2/β-catenin at adherens junctions during epidermal morphogenesis (Costa et al. 1998). HMP-2/β-catenin binds the intracellular tail of the transmembrane HMR-1/cadherin, strengthening cell-cell adhesion by simultaneously binding to the actin-binding protein HMP-1/α-catenin (Costa et al. 1998; Maiden and Hardin 2011; Maiden et al. 2013). During epidermal morphogenesis, a subset of epidermal cells migrates from the dorsal surface towards the ventral midline of the embryo. Once ventral enclosure is completed, actomyosin contractions in the epidermis shorten the cells along the dorsoventral axis while lengthening occurs along the anteroposterior axis, elongating the body of the animal 4-fold by the time of hatching (Chisholm and Hardin 2005). F-actin fails to properly localize to adherens junctions when there is a loss of HMP-2/ β-catenin or HMP-1/α-catenin, producing shorter animals with dorsal humps when the process of body elongation fails (Costa et al. 1998; Maiden et al. 2013). The phenotypes we observed in wildtype after hmp-2(RNAi) by feeding are relatively weak as RNAi by injection, or animals that are homozygous null, results in almost complete embryonic lethality (Costa et al. 1998; Sönnichsen et al. 2005). Several studies have implicated microtubules in the regulation of cadherin-based adhesions (Aono et al. 1999; Stehbens 2006; Meng et al. 2008; Maiden et al. 2016; Ning et al. 2016; Quintin et al. 2016), including one in C. elegans that showed disrupting microtubules at the 1.5/1.7-fold stage of elongation also perturbed junctional E-cadherin appearance and turnover (Quintin et al. 2016). The greater percentage of embryos that failed to hatch after hmp-2 knockdown in unc-33(e204) compared to wildtype might further support a role for microtubules at adherens junctions and indicate a novel role for UNC-33 in regulating microtubule dynamics during epidermal morphogenesis. Future experimentation using advanced microscopy and additional genetic analyses will be needed to determine how and when this particular genetic interaction impacts embryogenesis.

Methods

Request a detailed protocol

C. elegans strains were cultured using standard protocols (Brenner 1974). Strains used include N2 [wildtype Bristol] and CB204 [unc-33(e204) IV]. Bacterial clones for feeding RNAi were obtained from the Ahringer library (Kamath and Ahringer 2003). Each gene insert was verified by Sanger sequencing through Eurofins Genomics using the following vector primers: GTCAGTGAGCGAGGAAGCAAC and CTCTTCGCTATTACGCCAGCTG. For knockdown by feeding RNAi, bacterial cultures were plated on NGM plates supplemented with 25 μg/mL carbenicillin, 10 μg/mL tetracycline, and 1 mM IPTG, and incubated for 3 days at room temperature to induce double-stranded RNA. L4 worms at 20 °C were fed bacteria for 48 hours and then singled to individual plates. After laying eggs for approximately 18 hours, the adults were removed and all progeny were counted via a dissecting microscope. After an additional 24 hours, the remaining number of eggs were counted. The violin plot, basic summary statistics, two-way ANOVA Type III, and the post-hoc Tukey analysis were all completed using R.

Acknowledgments

Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). Ahringer library clones were kind gifts from Jeff Hardin. Special thanks to Joey Hubbard for help with the statistical analysis.

References

Alfaro-Aco R, Petry S. 2015. Building the microtubule cytoskeleton piece by piece. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 290(28):17154–17162.
PubMed
Aono S, Nakagawa S, Reynolds AB, Takeichi M. 1999. p120(ctn) Acts as an inhibitory regulator of cadherin function in colon carcinoma cells. Journal of Cell Biology. 145(3):551–562.
PubMed
Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77(1):71–94.
PubMed
Chisholm AD, Hardin J. 2005 Dec. Epidermal morphogenesis. WormBook. Dec 1:1–22.
PubMed
Costa M, Raich W, Agbunag C, Leung B, Hardin J, Priess JR. 1998. A putative catenin-cadherin system mediates morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. The Journal of cell biology. 141(1):297–308.
PubMed
Ferguson EL, Horvitz HR. 1985. Identification and characterization of 22 genes that affect the vulval cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 110(1):17–72.
PubMed
Fukata Y, Itoh TJ, Kimura T, Ménager C, Nishimura T, Shiromizu T, Watanabe H, Inagaki N, Iwamatsu A, Hotani H, et al. 2002. CRMP-2 binds to tubulin heterodimers to promote microtubule assembly. Nature Cell Biology. 4(8):583–591.
PubMed
Gally C, Wissler F, Zahreddine H, Quintin S, Landmann F, Labouesse M. 2009. Myosin II regulation during C. elegans embryonic elongation: LET-502/ROCK, MRCK-1 and PAK-1, three kinases with different roles. Development. 136(18):3109–3119.
PubMed
Hedgecock EM, Culotti JG, Thomson JN, Perkins LA. 1985. Axonal guidance mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans identified by filling sensory neurons with fluorescein dyes. Developmental Biology. 111(1):158–170.
PubMed
Kamath RS, Ahringer J. 2003. Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods. 30(4):313–321.
PubMed
Kusch M, Edgar RS. 1986. Genetic studies of unusual loci that affect body shape of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and may code for cuticle structural proteins. Genetics. 113(3):621–39.
PubMed
Lacroix B, Bourdages KG, Dorn JF, Ihara S, Sherwood DR, Maddox PS, Maddox AS. 2014. In situ imaging in C. elegans reveals developmental regulation of microtubule dynamics. Developmental Cell. 29(2):203–216.
PubMed
Li W, Herman RK, Shaw JE. 1992. Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans, axonal guidance and outgrowth gene unc-33. Genetics. 132(3):675–89.
PubMed
Lin PC, Chan PM, Hall C, Manser E. 2011. Collapsin response mediator proteins (CRMPs) are a new class of microtubule-associated protein (MAP) that selectively interacts with assembled microtubules via a taxol-sensitive binding interaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(48):41466–41478.
PubMed
Maiden SL, Hardin J. 2011. The secret life of α-catenin: Moonlighting in morphogenesis. Journal of Cell Biology. 195(4):543–552.
PubMed
Maiden SL, Harrison N, Keegan J, Cain B, Lynch AM, Pettitt J, Hardin J. 2013. Specific conserved C-terminal amino acids of Caenorhabditis elegans HMP-1/α-catenin modulate f-actin binding independently of vinculin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288(8):5694–5706.
PubMed
Maiden SL, Petrova YI, Gumbiner BM. 2016. Microtubules Inhibit E-Cadherin Adhesive Activity by Maintaining Phosphorylated p120-Catenin in a Colon Carcinoma Cell Model. PLoS ONE. 11(2):1–18.
PubMed
McKeown C, Praitis V, Austin J. 1998. sma-1 encodes a betaH-spectrin homolog required for Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis. Development (Cambridge, England). 125(11):2087–2098.
PubMed
Meng W, Mushika Y, Ichii T, Takeichi M. 2008. Anchorage of Microtubule Minus Ends to Adherens Junctions Regulates Epithelial Cell-Cell Contacts. Cell. 135(5):948–959.
PubMed
Ning W, Yu Y, Xu H, Liu X, Wang D, Wang J, Wang Y, Meng W. 2016. The CAMSAP3-ACF7 Complex Couples Noncentrosomal Microtubules with Actin Filaments to Coordinate Their Dynamics. Developmental Cell. 39(1):61–74.
PubMed
Oegema K, Hyman AA. 2006 Jan 19. Cell division. WormBook. Jan 19:1–40.
PubMed
Piekny AJ, Wissmann A, Mains PE. 2000. Embryonic morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans integrates the activity of LET-502 Rho-binding kinase, MEL-11 myosin phosphatase, DAF-2 insulin receptor and FEM-2 PP2c phosphatase. Genetics. 156(4):1671–89.
PubMed
Praitis V, Ciccone E, Austin J. 2005. SMA-1 spectrin has essential roles in epithelial cell sheet morphogenesis in C. elegans. Developmental Biology. 283(1):157–170.
PubMed
Quintin S, Wang S, Pontabry J, Bender A, Robin F, Hyenne V, Landmann F, Gally C, Oegema K, Labouesse M. 2016. Non-centrosomal epidermal microtubules act in parallel to LET-502/ROCK to promote C. elegans elongation. Journal of Cell Science. 129(2):e1.2-e1.2.
PubMed
Rose L, Gonczy P. 2014. Polarity establishment, asymmetric division and segregation of fate determinants in early C. elegans embryos. WormBook. Dec 30:1–43.
PubMed
Sönnichsen B, Koski LB, Walsh A, Marschall P, Neumann B, Brehm M, Alleaume A-M, Artelt J, Bettencourt P, Cassin E, et al. 2005. Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 434(7032):462–469.
PubMed
Stehbens SJ, Paterson AD, Crampton MS, Shewan AM, Ferguson C, Akhmanova A, Parton RG, Yap AS. 2006. Dynamic microtubules regulate the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. Journal of Cell Science. 119(9):1801–1811.
PubMed
Takemoto T, Sasaki Y, Hamajima N, Goshima Y, Nonaka M, Kimura H. 2000. Cloning and characterization of the Caenorhabditis elegans CeCRMP/DHP-1 and -2; common ancestors of CRMP and dihydropyrimidinase? Gene. 261(2):259–267.
PubMed
Tsuboi D, Hikita T, Qadota H, Amano M, Kaibuchi K. 2005. Regulatory machinery of UNC-33 Ce-CRMP localization in neurites during neuronal development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neurochemistry. 95(6):1629–1641.
PubMed
Williams-Masson EM, Heid PJ, Lavin CA, Hardin J. 1998. The cellular mechanism of epithelial rearrangement during morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans dorsal hypodermis. Developmental biology. 204(1):263–76.
PubMed

Funding

This work was funded by the Biology Department at Truman State University.

Author Contributions

John Garzanelli: Investigation, Writing - original draft
Stephanie Maiden: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review and editing, Resources, Writing - original draft.

Reviewed By

Anonymous

History

Received: July 1, 2020
Revision received: July 23, 2020
Accepted: July 27, 2020
Published: July 30, 2020

Copyright

© 2020 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Garzanelli, J; Maiden, S (2020). Exposing a novel genetic interaction between unc-33/CRMP and hmp-2/β-catenin during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000286.
Download: RIS BibTeX
microPublication Biology is published by
1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125
The microPublication project is supported by
The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01
microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430