microPublication

Get Your Data Out, Be Cited

  • About
    • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Staff
      • Editorial Board
      • Criteria For Publication
      • Publishing Information
      • Data Sharing Policy
    • For Authors
      • Preparation And Submission Of A Manuscript
      • Peer Review Process
      • Following Acceptance
      • Appeals
    • For Reviewers
    • Why micropublish?
  • Submit a microPublication
  • Journals
    • microPublication Biology
      • Editorial Board
  • microPublications
    • Biology
      • Species
        • Arabidopsis
        • C. elegans
        • D. discoideum
        • Drosophila
        • Human
        • Mouse
        • S. cerevisiae
        • S. pombe
        • Xenopus
        • Zebrafish
      • Categories
        • Phenotype Data
        • Methods
        • Expression Data
        • Genotype Data
        • Integrations
        • Genetic Screens
        • Models of Human Disease
        • Software
        • Interaction data
        • Database Updates
        • Electrophysiology Data
        • Phylogenetic Data
        • Science and Society
        • Biochemistry
  • Contact
  • More
    • Archives
    • FAQs
    • Newsletter
microPublication / Biology / Deletion of a putative HDA-1...
Deletion of a putative HDA-1 binding site in the hlh-2 promoter eliminates expression in C. elegans dorsal uterine cells
Taylor N Medwig-Kinney1, Nicholas J Palmisano1 and David Q Matus1
1Stony Brook University
Correspondence to: David Q Matus (david.matus@stonybrook.edu)
These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

The helix-loop-helix transcription factor hlh-2 (E/Daughterless) has been shown to play an important role in regulating cell fate patterning, cell cycle, and basement membrane invasion in the context of the development of the C. elegans somatic gonad. Here, using CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering, we generated a new hlh-2 allele (hlh-2(Δ-1303-702)) in the endogenous, GFP-tagged hlh-2 locus. This allele represents a deletion of a 601 bp region in the hlh-2 promoter that contains a putative binding site of the histone deacetylase hda-1 (HDAC) according to publicly available ChIP-sequencing data. Strikingly, we find that HLH-2 expression is virtually absent in the dorsal uterine cells of hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) animals compared to wild type controls. Levels of HLH-2 in the anchor cell and ventral uterine cells are only modestly reduced in the mutant; however, this does not seem to be functionally significant based on the lack of relevant phenotypes and expression levels of a downstream gene, NHR-67 (TLX/Tailless/NR2E1), in these cells. Taken together, these results support growing evidence that HDACs can potentially positively regulate transcription and provide a new reagent for studying hlh-2 regulation.

Figure 1. Characterization of new allele deleting putative HDA-1 binding site from the hlh-2 promoter: (A) Schematic of the endogenous GFP::hlh-2 locus and promoter region, annotated with a previously characterized proximal regulatory element, putative HDA-1 binding site (based on published ChIP-sequencing data) and binding motif, and the genomic region deleted in the hlh-2(bmd231) mutant. (B) Nuclear expression of wild type (wt) GFP::hlh-2 in the anchor cell (AC), dorsal uterine (DU) cells, and ventral uterine (VU) cells. (C-D) Nuclear expression of GFP::hlh-2 in the AC (solid arrowhead), DU (arrows), and VU (unfilled arrowheads) cells of hlh-2(WT) and hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) animals. (D-E) Cytoplasmic expression of HLH-2 in the AC of hlh-2(WT) and hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) animals. (F-G) Expression of nhr-67::TagRFP-T in hlh-2(WT) and hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) animals. (H-I) Levels of GFP::hlh-2 following depletion of hda-1 via RNA interference compared to empty vector control in the DU (nuclei outlined hda-1(RNAi) micrograph). Statistical significance determined through using an unpaired two sample t-test, with Welch’s correction (*p ≤ 0.05; ***p ≤ 0.001; n.s., not significant). Scale bars: 5 µm.

Description

During C. elegans development, two cells, Z1 and Z4, give rise to the entire somatic gonad, including populations of dorsal uterine (DU) and ventral uterine (VU) cells, as well as the postmitotic anchor cell (AC), which invades the underlying basement membrane during uterine-vulval morphogenesis (Kimble & Hirsh, 1979; Sherwood & Sternberg, 2003). The helix-loop-helix transcription factor hlh-2 (E/Daughterless) is expressed in these three cell types, among others, and is particularly enriched in the AC following post-transcriptional down-regulation of HLH-2 in the VU through dimerization-driven degradation (Karp & Greenwald, 2003; Sallee & Greenwald, 2015). At the L2 stage, HLH-2 regulates the Notch signaling event that specifies AC and VU fates, with its initial onset predicting the lineage ultimately giving rise to the presumptive VU (Karp & Greenwald, 2004; Attner et al., 2019). Following AC/VU specification, HLH-2 functions to regulate cell cycle arrest and invasion of the AC (Medwig-Kinney et al., 2020; Schindler & Sherwood, 2011). We and others have shown that HLH-2 does so by regulating expression of the nuclear hormone receptor and transcription factor NHR-67 (Tailless/TLX/NR2E1), and likely cell-cycle independent, pro-invasive targets as well (Bodofsky et al., 2018; Medwig-Kinney et al., 2020).

In addition to hlh-2 and nhr-67, the histone deacetylase (HDAC) hda-1 was also identified as a regulator of AC invasion through a reverse genetic screen (Matus et al., 2010). It was later shown that hda-1 function is necessary for AC invasive fate differentiation and plays a role in the pro-invasive pathway encompassing NHR-67 (Matus et al., 2015). In order to further elucidate the mechanism by which HDA-1 regulates AC invasion, we sought to test we sought to test whether HDA-1 regulated expression of hlh-2. Previous studies of the hlh-2 promoter identified a proximal regulatory element (hlh-2(prox)) that confers expression in the AC and VU cells specifically (Figure 1A) (Sallee & Greenwald, 2015). Approximately 3.3 kb downstream of this hlh-2(prox) element is an HDA-1 binding motif that lies within a putative HDA-1 binding site based on ChIP-sequencing data generated by the modENCODE Project (Figure 1A) (Shao et al., 2020; Celniker et al., 2009). Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering, we edited the endogenous hlh-2 locus to introduce a deletion mutation (hlh-2(bmd231)) from 1303 to 702 base pairs (bp) upstream of the GFP start codon, hereafter referred to as hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) (Figure 1A).

Consistent with findings using immunostaining, we find that endogenous GFP::hlh-2 expression is normally enriched in the AC compared to the VU and DU (Karp & Greenwald, 2003) (Figure 1B). When compared to wild type, the hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) mutant showed a modest but statistically significant reduction in HLH-2 expression in the AC and VU cells (Figure 1C-D). The endogenous GFP::hlh-2 allele paired with high resolution microscopy allowed us to detect subtle regulation of HLH-2 expression by hda-1 in the AC and VU cells that was not previously reported using a transgenic reporter (Ranawade et al., 2013). DU expression, however, was virtually eliminated in the mutant when accounting for camera-derived background noise (Figure 1C-D). We also observed that cytoplasmic expression of HLH-2 in the AC was modestly reduced in the mutant as well (Figure D-E). However, the alterations in HLH-2 expression in the AC and VU do not seem to be functionally significant, as expression of a NHR-67, a downstream target of HLH-2 in the cell cycle dependent pro-invasive gene regulatory network (Medwig-Kinney et al., 2020), was not significantly reduced (Figure 1F-G). Furthermore, no defects in AC specification or invasion were observed in any of the strains containing the hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) allele (n > 50) based on both the presence of a single AC and an underlying gap in the basement membrane, in all animals examined (visualized by cdh-3p::mCherry::moeABD and laminin::GFP, respectively). RNAi-induced knockdown of hda-1 resulted in reduced levels of HLH-2 in the DU, providing further evidence of this regulatory interaction (Figure 1H-I).

In summary, here we generate and characterize a new mutant allele of hlh-2. Deletion of the genomic region containing a putative HDA-1 binding site from the hlh-2 promoter appears to primarily affect expression in the DU cells and is recapitulated through RNAi-induced knockdown of hda-1. Although HDA-1 is traditionally thought of as a repressor of transcription through chromatin deacetylation (Kadosh & Struhl, 1997; Kadosh & Struhl, 1998; Rundlett et al., 1998; Gui et al., 2003), this data adds to the growing evidence that HDACs can also function as activators of transcription (Vidal & Gaber, 1991; De Nadal et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2014). Whether there is a functional consequence of hlh-2 depletion in the DU cells is currently unknown. It is our hope that this reagent will be useful to the C. elegans community to further study the roles of hda-1 and hlh-2.

Methods

Request a detailed protocol

Strain maintenance:

Animals were reared under standard conditions and cultured at 25°C (Brenner, 1974). Animals were synchronized through alkaline hypochlorite treatment of gravid adults to isolate eggs (Porta-de-la-Riva et al., 2012). The RNAi clone targeting hda-1 was generated by cloning 923 bp of cDNA (available from wormbase.org; Harris et al., 2020) into the highly efficient T444T RNAi feeding vector (Sturm et al., 2018). RNAi experiments were performed by feeding synchronized L1s following hypochlorite treatment.

CRISPR/Cas9 injections:

In order to generate the deletion mutation in the hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) allele, Cas9 protein injections were performed as previously described (Paix et al., 2014; Ghanta et al., 2020) with minor modifications to the published protocols. In short, a 200 bp ssODN donor repair ultramer for hlh-2 (IDT) was constructed. To facilitate easy screening of our edit, a PvuI restriction site was engineered into the ssODN repair oligo as previously described (Paix et al., 2014), flanked on each side by 94 bp of sequence homologous to the region surrounding the putative HDA-1 binding site. Single guide RNAs for hlh-2 and dpy-10 (co-CRISPR marker) were purchased from CRISPRevolution by Synthego (Synthego Corporation). The Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex was formed by incubating 30 pmols of Cas9 NLS protein (California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences at UC Berkeley (QB3-Berkeley)) with 23.75 pmoles of each hlh-2 gRNA, and 47.5 pmoles of dpy-10 sgRNA for 15 minutes at 37°C. The hlh-2 and dpy-10 ssODN donor repair ultramers (IDT) were then added to the reaction at a final concentration of 2.2 µg.

TagRFP-T::AID was inserted into the C-terminus of the endogenous nhr-67 locus via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome engineering using the self-excising cassette method (Dickinson et al., 2013; Dickinson et al., 2015). The sgRNA targeting sequence in pDD122 was replaced with the sgRNA targeting the C-terminus of nhr-67 using Gibson cloning (Dickinson et al., 2013). The repair template for nhr-67 was generated by cloning homology arms, synthesized by Twist Biosciences (left homology arm) and by PCR using genomic DNA as a template (right homology arm), into pTNM063 (TagRFP-T::AID repair template) (Ashley et al., 2021).

Live cell imaging:

Micrographs were collected on a Hamamatsu Orca EM-CCD camera mounted on an upright Zeiss AxioImager A2 with a Borealis-modified CSU10 Yokagawa spinning disk scan head (Nobska Imaging) using 488 nm and 561 nm Vortran lasers in a VersaLase merge and a Plan-Apochromat 100×/1.4 (NA) Oil DIC objective. MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices) was used for microscopy automation. Animals were mounted into a drop of M9 on a 5% Noble agar pad containing approximately 10 mM sodium azide anesthetic and topped with a coverslip.

Image quantification:

Images were processed using Fiji/ImageJ (v.2.0.0) (Schindelin et al., 2012). Nuclear expression of HLH-2 and NHR-67 was quantified by measuring mean gray value as previously described (Medwig-Kinney et al., 2020). DU and VU cells were sampled by selecting the three most proximal to the AC and closest to the coverslip. Cytoplasmic expression of HLH-2 was measured using the freehand selection tool, tracing the outline of the cell but excluding the nucleus. For all quantification, background subtraction was performed by subtracting the mean gray value of a background region of an equal area to account for EM-CCD camera noise.

Data visualization and statistical analysis:

Representative micrographs were processed using Fiji/ImageJ and assembled into figures using Adobe Illustrator (v.23.0.6). RStudio (v.1.4.1717) was used to generate violin/sina plots and to perform statistical analyses.

Reagents

Strains:

Strain Genotype Source
DQM350 hlh-2(bmd90[hlh-2p::LoxP::GFP::HLH-2]) I;

qyIs225[cdh-3p::mCherry::moeABD] V;

qyIs7[laminin::GFP] X.

Medwig-Kinney et al., (2020)
DQM704 nhr-67(bmd212[nhr-67p::NHR-67::TagRFP-T::AID]) IV; hlh-2(bmd90[hlh-2p::LoxP::GFP::HLH-2]) I. This study
DQM785 hlh-2(bmd231[hlh-2p(Δ-1303-702)>LoxP::GFP::HLH-2]) I; qyIs225[cdh-3p::mCherry::moeABD] V; qyIs7[laminin::GFP] X. This study
DQM900 hlh-2(bmd231[hlh-2p(Δ-1303-702)::LoxP::GFP::HLH-2]) I; nhr-67(bmd212[nhr-67p::NHR-67::TagRFP-T::AID]) IV. This study

 

Sequences:

Reagent Sequence
dpy-10 sgRNA GCUACCAUAGGCACCACGAG + Synthego modified EZ Scaffold
dpy-10 ssODN CACTTGAACTTCAATACGGCAAGATGAGAATGACTGGAAACCGTACCGCATGCGGTGCCT

ATGGTAGCGGAGCTTCACATGGCTTCAGACCAACAGCCTAT

hda-1(RNAi) targeting sequence TTGATGGAGCACGGTAAGCGCCGTGTCGCCTACTACTATGACTCCAACATTGGAAATTACTA

TTATGGTCAAGGGCACGTCATGAAGCCACATCGTATCAGAATGACCCATCATCTCGTTCTCA

ACTATGGTCTGTACCGGAATTTAGAGATTTTCCGCCCATTCCCTGCATCATTCGAAGACATG

ACTCGTTTTCACAGCGACGAGTACATGACGTTTTTGAAGAGTGCGAATCCAGATAATCTGA

AATCCTTCAACAAACAAATGCTTAAGTTCAATGTTGGAGAAGATTGTCCTCTCTTTGATGG

TCTTTATGAGTTCTGCCAACTCAGTTCGGGAGGTTCTCTGGCTGCTGCCACTAAATTGAAC

AAGCAGAAGGTGGACATTGCTATCAATTGGATGGGAGGCCTCCATCACGCCAAGAAAAG

CGAGGCGTCCGGATTCTGTTACACCAATGACATCGTTCTCGGTATTCTCGAGCTTCTCAAG

TACCACAAGCGAGTACTTTACGTCGATATTGATGTTCATCACGGAGATGGAGTAGAGGAG

GCGTTCTATACGACTGATCGAGTAATGACAGTGTCATTCCATAAATATGGAGATTTCTTCCC

AGGAACCGGAGACCTGAAAGATATAGGAGCTGGAAAAGGAAAGCTCTATTCAGTCAATG

TTCCACTTCGCGATGGAATCACCGACGTCTCTTACCAGAGTATTTTTAAACCAATCATGAC

AAAGGTTATGGAGAGATTTGATCCCTGTGCTGTTGTTCTTCAATGTGGAGCTGATTCTCTC

AACGGAGATAGACTTGGACCATTCAATCTGACCTTGAAAGGCCACGGAGAATGTGCTCG

TTTCTTCCGAAGCTACAACGTTCCACTTATGATGGTCGGTGGAGGTGGATACACTCCAAG

AAATGTGGCACG

hlh-2 (-1303 bp) gRNA AUGAAUGUACUCCCUACAGU + Synthego modified EZ Scaffold
hlh-2 (-702 bp) gRNA UAAGGAUUCGUAAACAUUGU+ Synthego modified EZ Scaffold
hlh-2(Δ-1303-702) ssODN CTCTCACTCTTACCATATTCTGAAGAATTAAAATTTCAGAGATCCCTACAAAACTCTAATAAC

ATGCTTCAAAAATGAATGTACTCCCTACAGTCGATCGTAATAGACAATGTTTACGAATCCTT

ACCAATTTTGAATTTAAACAAGAACGCAAATGTATTGTAGGGCAGTTTTTTTTTCAATTATT

GAGTTTATCAAAA

nhr-67 C-terminus sgRNA AGAGAGTGTTAATGTTGAAG

 

nhr-67 C-terminus left homology arm GGAATAATGTGAGACTTCACTATAAAGGTAAACGCTGTTTTTCTGAGTGGGTTGCAACGATC

AAAGTTAATTAAATATTGTATTTGCTAGTTTGAAGGTTGCTAATTCTTTTTTAAAATTAATTAA

TTAACCAATTGAAAAAGTTCATTTATAGTTTTTGTACGATTATCCTATTCAAAAGTTCATTTTT

CGGCTCAAAATATAAAAAATTCCACAATTAAAAAAGCAGTGTTTTTTGTTCTCACAAAAAAT

GCAAATTATTTCCTATTTGCTTAAAAAGCGAAATTGATTATTGAAAACTAATGAAAACTAAA

CGCTCTAGTACCATCTTTCCTTCTGAAAACTTCACAGTCTGAAACCTATTTCAGATGTATAAA

TGCAATTGCCGCTATTCCAACAACTTCAATAATTGATGTTCTATTCCGCCCTTCAATTGGATC

AGCTTCAATGCCAAGACTTATTCAAGACATGTTCAAGCCACCACAACAACCCACTCCTACG

TCACTGTTTCCAATGGCAAACTTCAATTTGAACTTTCTATTAAAACAAGAAAAAACCGAAA

CTGAAGAGGGTGAAGATATTGAAGAAGAGGATGATGCGACGAGTAGCAATCAATTTGATG

AAAATTCTTCTACTGATGATAGGTATGATGAGCATTTATTAGTACAGTGGATTAACTGAGTC

TGTTGCAGATCTGTCGGAGAACTGGATCCCGTTCAACTTTTCTTGGCTCTTAATTCCTCAAC

TCAGCCTTCATCGGCATCATCCCCTTCCTCTTCAAGACCACGTCATTCGATTCGATCAATAAC

TGAATTATTATCAATTCAAGAAGAGGAAAGCGTGAACGTGGAGGAAGTG

nhr-67 C-terminus right homology arm TAAATAGTAAATTCATGTTTCATATACAGTAACTCAATTATTCTAAGTATCTCTTTTCATTGTCT

TTTTCACTCCGTTTCTTGCCTCGCCCGGATTTTCATTGGATTTTGATTTATACTTTCAAAATTT

CATTTTTCAATTGTAAATTTTTAATTTAAATTTAGAGAAAAAAAATGGTAAGCTTTAAAACTA

ATTTATTATTTTCTGATTTATATTGTGAACAGATGAATAAAACGTTTACAACAATGGCAATTG

GCATACAAACATCATTAAAAAAAGGTGAATCATACAGTTTTGAGAAGACTACATATGATTCG

AAACATAAAAAACAATAGAAATCAATAAATGATGGGAGAGAAACCGAGAGATTTATTGGAA

AATGGAACGGTTGAATGTCATATTGTGTCATCGTCGTTTTCCTTGTTAATGGCCTCGTTTCTT

ATCATATCCATATCATTCTGATATTCCCATTCAACTAGATGACCAAATCATTAGCTGACTGATT

TCCCCCTTTTTAATGATTTGTTTATGGTTTTGTCAATAGTTTGAACGCGTTACGTTTTTGTAGA

TAAACCTGATTATGCTAGAATATTTTTTATTGAGATTTATTGACTAATTTAAAGTTTTAAACTA

ACAGAACAACAACCAATATTATAAAGAAAATGCTTTAAACTCATTTTTGAACATCCAGAACA

TCCGAAAAATAACCAACATGGTTAAGATTTTTCAAAGTTTTTAGTCAAAGTTTCGGTATCTAT

TTGCAATTTTCAAAAAACATGGAATATTTTCAGTAATTGCTTTTTCGAACTCCCAGACTGTTT

GAATACAAAAATTGAAAAGCAAGTAAACAATAAAAAATTGTAGATATTTTTTCAAAGACTTT

CAAAATTATAGGCGTAGGCTTCACTAATTTTTGACTGTCAGTAAAATATTTATTTCAAAAAAA

TTTTAAAAGTTTTACCATAATATTTGGGCATGGGCATTTTACTTTTAAAAACGATTTCTAAAG

AAACCATTTTTATATGTAAAACAGTTTTGCTCAATTTTACCAGTTATCAA

Forward primer to amplify nhr-67 C-terminus right homology arm from gDNA CGGCGGCGTTCGTGAAATAAATAGTAAATTCATGTTTCATATAC
Reverse primer to amplify nhr-67 C-terminus right homology arm from gDNA GCTATGACCATGTTATCGATTTCCTAGTTGATAACTGGTAAAATTGAGCA

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Christopher Hammell at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory for sharing his Cas9 protein-based CRISPR protocol and reagents.

References

Ashley GE, Duong T, Levenson MT, Martinez MAQ, Johnson LC, Hibshman JD, Saeger HN, Palmisano NJ, Doonan R, Martinez-Mendez R, Davidson BR, Zhang W, Ragle JM, Medwig-Kinney TN, Sirota SS, Goldstein B, Matus DQ, Dickinson DJ, Reiner DJ, Ward JD. 2021. An expanded auxin-inducible degron toolkit for Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 217: iyab006.
PubMed
Attner MA, Keil W, Benavidez JM, Greenwald I. 2019. HLH-2/E2A Expression Links Stochastic and Deterministic Elements of a Cell Fate Decision during C. elegans Gonadogenesis. Curr Biol 29: 3094-3100.e4.
PubMed
Bodofsky S, Liberatore K, Pioppo L, Lapadula D, Thompson L, Birnbaum S, McClung G, Kartik A, Clever S, Wightman B. 2018. A tissue-specific enhancer of the C. elegans nhr-67/tailless gene drives coordinated expression in uterine stem cells and the differentiated anchor cell. Gene Expr Patterns 30: 71-81.
PubMed
Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71-94.
PubMed
Celniker SE, Dillon LA, Gerstein MB, Gunsalus KC, Henikoff S, Karpen GH, Kellis M, Lai EC, Lieb JD, MacAlpine DM, Micklem G, Piano F, Snyder M, Stein L, White KP, Waterston RH, modENCODE Consortium. 2009. Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459: 927-30.
PubMed
De Nadal E, Zapater M, Alepuz PM, Sumoy L, Mas G, Posas F. 2004. The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes. Nature 427: 370-4.
PubMed
Dickinson DJ, Ward JD, Reiner DJ, Goldstein B. 2013. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat Methods 10: 1028-34.
PubMed
Dickinson DJ, Pani AM, Heppert JK, Higgins CD, Goldstein B. 2015. Streamlined Genome Engineering with a Self-Excising Drug Selection Cassette. Genetics 200: 1035-49.
PubMed
Ghanta KS, Mello CC. 2020. Melting dsDNA Donor Molecules Greatly Improves Precision Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 216: 643-650.
PubMed
Gui CY, Ngo L, Xu WS, Richon VM, Marks PA. 2004. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor activation of p21WAF1 involves changes in promoter-associated proteins, including HDAC1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1241-6.
PubMed
Harris TW, Arnaboldi V, Cain S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Cho J, Davis P, Gao S, Grove CA, Kishore R, Lee RYN, Muller HM, Nakamura C, Nuin P, Paulini M, Raciti D, Rodgers FH, Russell M, Schindelman G, Auken KV, Wang Q, Williams G, Wright AJ, Yook K, Howe KL, Schedl T, Stein L, Sternberg PW. 2020. WormBase: a modern Model Organism Information Resource. Nucleic Acids Res 48: D762-D767.
PubMed
Kadosh D, Struhl K. 1997. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89: 365-71.
PubMed
Kadosh D, Struhl K. 1998. Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev 12: 797-805.
PubMed
Karp X, Greenwald I. 2003. Post-transcriptional regulation of the E/Daughterless ortholog HLH-2, negative feedback, and birth order bias during the AC/VU decision in C. elegans. Genes Dev 17: 3100-11.
PubMed
Karp X, Greenwald I. 2004. Multiple roles for the E/Daughterless ortholog HLH-2 during C. elegans gonadogenesis. Dev Biol 272: 460-9.
PubMed
Kimble J, Hirsh D. 1979. The postembryonic cell lineages of the hermaphrodite and male gonads in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 70: 396-417.
PubMed
Matus DQ, Li XY, Durbin S, Agarwal D, Chi Q, Weiss SJ, Sherwood DR. 2010. In vivo identification of regulators of cell invasion across basement membranes. Sci Signal 3: ra35.
PubMed
Matus DQ, Lohmer LL, Kelley LC, Schindler AJ, Kohrman AQ, Barkoulas M, Zhang W, Chi Q, Sherwood DR. 2015. Invasive Cell Fate Requires G1 Cell-Cycle Arrest and Histone Deacetylase-Mediated Changes in Gene Expression. Dev Cell 35: 162-74.
PubMed
Medwig-Kinney TN, Smith JJ, Palmisano NJ, Tank S, Zhang W, Matus DQ. 2020. A developmental gene regulatory network for C. elegans anchor cell invasion. Development 147: dev185850.
PubMed
Paix A, Wang Y, Smith HE, Lee CY, Calidas D, Lu T, Smith J, Schmidt H, Krause MW, Seydoux G. 2014. Scalable and versatile genome editing using linear DNAs with microhomology to Cas9 Sites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 198: 1347-56.
PubMed
Porta-de-la-Riva M, Fontrodona L, Villanueva A, Cerón J. 2012. Basic Caenorhabditis elegans methods: synchronization and observation. J Vis Exp 64: e4019.
PubMed
Ranawade AV, Cumbo P, Gupta BP. 2013. Caenorhabditis elegans histone deacetylase hda-1 is required for morphogenesis of the vulva and LIN-12/Notch-mediated specification of uterine cell fates. G3 (Bethesda) 3: 1363-74.
PubMed
Rundlett SE, Carmen AA, Suka N, Turner BM, Grunstein M. 1998. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392: 831-5.
PubMed
Sallee MD, Greenwald I. 2015. Dimerization-driven degradation of C. elegans and human E proteins. Genes Dev 29: 1356-61.
PubMed
Schindler AJ, Sherwood DR. 2011. The transcription factor HLH-2/E/Daughterless regulates anchor cell invasion across basement membrane in C. elegans. Dev Biol 357: 380-91.
PubMed
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 676-82.
PubMed
Shao LW, Peng Q, Dong M, Gao K, Li Y, Li Y, Li CY, Liu Y. 2020. Histone deacetylase HDA-1 modulates mitochondrial stress response and longevity. Nat Commun 11: 4639.
PubMed
Sherwood DR, Sternberg PW. 2003. Anchor cell invasion into the vulval epithelium in C. elegans. Dev Cell 5: 21-31.
PubMed
Sturm Á, Saskoi É, Tibor K, Weinhardt N, Vellai T. 2018. Highly efficient RNAi and Cas9-based auto-cloning systems for C. elegans research. Nucleic Acids Res 46: e105.
PubMed
Vidal M, Gaber RF. 1991. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11: 6317-27.
PubMed
Wang Z, Lyu J, Wang F, Miao C, Nan Z, Zhang J, Xi Y, Zhou Q, Yang X, Ge W. 2018. The histone deacetylase HDAC1 positively regulates Notch signaling during Drosophila wing development. Biol Open 7: bio029637.
PubMed

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [1R01GM121597-01 to D.Q.M.]. D.Q.M. is also a Damon Runyon-Rachleff Innovator supported (in part) by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRR-47-17]. T.N.M.-K. is supported by the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [F31HD100091-03]. N.J.P. is supported by the American Cancer Society [132969-PF-18-226-01-CSM].

Author Contributions

Taylor N Medwig-Kinney: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing - original draft
Nicholas J Palmisano: Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Writing - review and editing
David Q Matus: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Reviewed By

Anonymous

History

Received: August 13, 2021
Revision received: August 24, 2021
Accepted: August 25, 2021
Published: September 2, 2021

Copyright

© 2021 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Medwig-Kinney, TN; Palmisano, NJ; Matus, DQ (2021). Deletion of a putative HDA-1 binding site in the hlh-2 promoter eliminates expression in C. elegans dorsal uterine cells. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000449.
Download: RIS BibTeX
microPublication Biology is published by
1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125
The microPublication project is supported by
The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01
microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430