microPublication

Get Your Data Out, Be Cited

  • About
    • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Staff
      • Editorial Board
      • Criteria For Publication
      • Publishing Information
      • Data Sharing Policy
    • For Authors
      • Preparation And Submission Of A Manuscript
      • Peer Review Process
      • Following Acceptance
      • Appeals
    • For Reviewers
    • Why micropublish?
  • Submit a microPublication
  • Journals
    • microPublication Biology
      • Editorial Board
  • microPublications
    • Biology
      • Species
        • Arabidopsis
        • C. elegans
        • D. discoideum
        • Drosophila
        • Human
        • Mouse
        • S. cerevisiae
        • S. pombe
        • Xenopus
        • Zebrafish
      • Categories
        • Phenotype Data
        • Methods
        • Expression Data
        • Genotype Data
        • Integrations
        • Genetic Screens
        • Models of Human Disease
        • Software
        • Interaction data
        • Database Updates
        • Electrophysiology Data
        • Phylogenetic Data
        • Science and Society
        • Biochemistry
  • Contact
  • More
    • Archives
    • FAQs
    • Newsletter
microPublication / Biology / A mutation in budding yeast...
A mutation in budding yeast BRR6 affecting nuclear envelope insertion of the spindle pole body
Jennifer M Gardner1, Eileen O'Toole2 and Sue L Jaspersen1,3
1Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110
2Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347
3Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160
Correspondence to: Sue L Jaspersen (slj@stowers.org)

Abstract

BRR6 and BRL1 are two paralogs that encode transmembrane proteins of the nuclear envelope (NE) involved in membrane fluidity and nuclear pore complex biogenesis in organisms that undergo a closed mitosis. We show that mutation of a conserved cysteine in the intralumenal domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Brr6p results in a novel temperature sensitive allele, brr6-Y100H, that arrests growth due to defects in spindle formation. Analysis of brr6-Y100H cells by electron tomography and Brr6p localization by super-resolution imaging supports the idea that Brr6p is involved in insertion of the newly duplicated spindle pole body into the NE.

Figure 1. Brr6p localization and function at the budding yeast SPB: A. Brr6p, Brl1p and S. pombe Brr6 domain structure, including the transmembrane domains and the signature Brr6p-C-C domain. Schematic of S. cerevisiae Brr6p topology in the NE based on data from (Zhang et al. 2018). B. BRR6 and brr6-Y100H containing plasmids were integrated into brr6∆::KANMX pURA3-BRR6 (SLJ6805) and the ability of each to function at the indicated temperatures was tested by plating 10-fold serial dilutions of cells onto SC-URA or 5-FOA, which selects for cells that have lost the pURA3-BRR6 covering plasmid. Plates were incubated for 2 d at 30°C and 37°C and for 3 d at 23°C and 26°C. C. BRR6 (SLJ9382) and brr6-Y100H (SLJ9383) cells were assayed for growth for 2 d at 30°C on YPD plates alone or with the indicated chemicals. D-G. Mid-log phase cultures of BRR6 (SLJ9382) and brr6-Y100H (SLJ9383) were grown at 30°C or shifted 37°C for 4 h. D. DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry. E. Spindle morphology was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using GFP-Tub1p (green) and Spc42p-mCherry (magenta) to detect microtubules and SPBs, respectively. Images of large-budded BRR6 and brr6-Y100H cells from the 37°C culture are shown with the cell outline (dashed lines) based on the widefield image. Bar, 2 µm. F. The percentage of large-budded cells containing bipolar and monopolar spindles is shown for each strain. Error bars, SEM. ****, p<0.0005 based on Student’s t-test. G. Spindle morphology in brr6-Y100H cells grown at 37°C was examined by electron tomography. Projections of spindles in two nuclei are depicted with nuclear microtubules highlighted in green (left tomogram; 29 nuclear microtubules) or magenta (right tomogram; 26 nuclear microtubules), cytoplasmic microtubules shown in yellow, microtubule plus ends marked in cyan and the SPBs represented in red. Insets show individual slices with a mature duplication plaque (arrowhead) and that is also colored in red in the tomograms. It is connected to the mother SPB and nucleates cytoplasmic microtubules. Bars, 100 nm. See Videos S1 and S2 for complete tomograms. On the right, a schematic of SPB duplication, including insertion of the new SPB that is blocked in brr6-Y100H mutants. H. SIM of Brr6p-GFP (yellow) and Ndc1p-mCherry (magenta) in cells undergoing SPB duplication. Bar, 200 nm. The cartoon depicts the position of both proteins in the side-by-side SPB.

Description

Nuclei, the defining characteristic of eukaryotic cells, are bound by a double lipid bilayer, referred to as the nuclear envelope (NE). Prior to mitosis, components of the microtubule cytoskeleton including microtubule-organizing centers (known as centrosomes in metazoans and spindle pole bodies (SPBs) in fungi) that are located in the cytoplasm throughout interphase must access replicated sister chromosomes located inside the nucleus to form the bipolar mitotic spindle. In metazoans, the NE breaks down (open mitosis); however, in fungi, SPBs are inserted into the NE and the NE remains intact during mitosis (closed mitosis) (reviewed in (Heath 1980; Makarova and Oliferenko 2016)). How a giant protein complex such as a SPB is inserted into the NE is largely unknown, although in budding yeast SPB insertion into the nuclear membrane is coupled with SPB duplication (Jaspersen 2021; Ruthnick and Schiebel 2018).

BRR6 encodes an essential transmembrane protein involved in lipid homeostasis, nuclear pore complex (NPC) assembly and transcription regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (de Bruyn Kops and Guthrie 2001; Hodge et al. 2010; de Bruyn Kops et al. 2018; Lone et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2018). Analysis of brr6+ function in fission yeast also suggested a role in SPB insertion into the NE (Tamm et al. 2011). Studies of Brr6p localization, binding partners and depletion phenotype (along with its paralog, BRL1) in budding yeast indicated a primary role in NPC biogenesis rather than SPB insertion (Zhang et al. 2018). Like SPBs, NPCs are multi-subunit protein complexes that are inserted into an intact NE. Genetic analysis in yeast indicates that membrane insertion of both NPCs and SPBs likely share common factors, including proteins involved in membrane curvature and stabilization (Casey et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2014; Chial et al. 1998; Witkin et al. 2010).

Previous work showed that Brr6p is a component of the NE, with its termini located in the nucleus and cytoplasm and its conserved central (Brr6p-C-C) domain located in the lumen between the inner nuclear membrane (INM) and outer nuclear membrane (ONM) (Figure 1A) (Zhang et al. 2018). The Brr6p-C-C domain is a highly conserved motif in Brr6p family members (Tamm et al. 2011), with cysteine residues that form intra- or inter-molecular disulfide bridges (Zhang et al. 2018). Mutation of a non-conserved residue in this domain (R110K, brr6-1) resulted in a conditional growth defect (de Bruyn Kops and Guthrie 2001), and mutation of all four cysteine residues resulted in a lethal allele (Zhang et al. 2018).

To further explore the role of the Brr6p-C-C domain in Brr6p function, we created a series of mutations within conserved residues and assayed complementation of brr6∆ using a plasmid shuffle strategy to determine the functionality of each construct. The ability to grow on 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) indicates the plasmid containing a wild-type copy of BRR6 can be lost and the deletion allele is able to rescue all essential Brr6p functions. We found that mutation of the conserved tyrosine located in the Brr6p-C-C domain to histidine (brr6-Y100H) resulted in reduced growth compared to wild-type at 23°, 26° and 30°C (Figure 1B). At 37°C, brr6-Y100H mutants failed to grow, indicating that it is a temperature sensitive allele of BRR6. Interestingly, mutation of the same conserved tyrosine in the Brr6p paralog Brl1p to histidine (brl1-Y347H) had no obvious growth defect at any temperature, and cellular morphology appeared normal.

Similar to brr6-1 mutants (Hodge et al. 2010), we found that addition of the sterol biosynthesis inhibitor terbinafine exacerbated the growth defect of brr6-Y100H cells at 30°C (Figure 1C), suggesting that defects in the Brr6p-C-C domain result in accumulation of ergosterol biosynthesis intermediates. However, brr6-Y100H mutants were only sensitive to addition of the unsaturated fatty acid oleic acid and not to the membrane fluidizer benzyl alcohol, consistent with the idea that loss of Brr6p function does not result in a growth arrest due to an inability to adapt to membrane perturbations (Figure 1C). We also found that growth of brr6-Y100H cells was exacerbated by addition of the microtubule depolymerizing agent benomyl (Figure 1C). Benomyl sensitivity is frequently observed in yeast mutants affecting mitotic spindle assembly.

To examine spindle structure, wild-type (BRR6) and mutant (brr6-Y100H) cells expressing GFP-TUB1 and SPC42-mCherry were grown overnight at the permissive temperature of 30°C then shifted to the non-permissive temperature of 37°C for 4 h. Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content revealed that brr6-Y100H cells shifted to 37°C accumulated with a 2N DNA content (Figure 1D). This suggests that brr6-Y100H cells arrest in mitosis at the restrictive temperature. Examination of microtubule structures showed that in large budded wild-type cells at both 30° and 37°C, virtually all spindles were bipolar with two foci of Spc42p-mCherry connected by GFP-Tub1p (Figure 1E-F). A fraction of brr6-Y100H mutants form bipolar spindles, however, 35% and 54% of large budded brr6-Y100H mutants at 30°C and 37°C, respectively, had monopolar spindles: a single focus of Spc42p-mCherry associated with GFP-Tub1p (Figure 1E-F). In many cases, a second SPB signal could be detected in brr6-Y100H mutants, as shown in the upper cell in Figure 1E. This ‘dead’ pole is thought to arise from defects in NE insertion of the new SPB during SPB duplication, while insertion of the mother SPB in the previous cell cycle is unaffected. This phenotype has been reported in mutants in NDC1, NBP1, BBP1, MPS1, MPS2 and MPS3, which play roles in nascent SPB assembly into the NE (reviewed in (Ruthnick and Schiebel 2018)).

Using electron tomography, we reconstructed spindles from ten brr6-Y100H mutant nuclei in cells grown at 37°C. Four nuclei contained two SPBs that had both inserted into the NE to result in duplicated side-by-side SPBs (2 nuclei), metaphase (1 nucleus) or anaphase (1 nucleus) spindles. In the remaining six nuclei, a distinct type of monopolar spindle was observed (Figure 1G, Video S1 & S2): SPB duplication had occurred, the mother SPB was located in the NE but insertion of the nascent SPB into NE was blocked, often resulting in a steep angle between this pole and the nuclear membrane. The newly formed SPB matured to a point that it, like the mother SPB, was able to nucleate cytoplasmic microtubules. However, because of the defect in NE insertion, the new SPB is unable to nucleate nuclear microtubules (hence, it is a ‘dead’ pole). Interestingly, the number of cytoplasmic microtubules formed at the mother SPB was high compared to a typical haploid SPB. Part of this may be due to increased SPB size compared to wild-type cells. The number of nuclear microtubules also increased to 37-56 microtubules/SPB compared to the typical 18-22 seen in wild-type haploids. Moreover, nuclear microtubules were long, often extending across the entire nucleus (Figure 1G).

Our observation that brr6-Y100H arrests in mitosis after a 4 h shift to the non-permissive temperature, combined with our cytological analysis demonstrating that over half of these cells contain nuclei with monopolar spindles, points to a requirement for Brr6p in insertion of the new SPB into the NE. Although brr6-Y100H cells have other phenotypes including those observed in brr6-1 and brr6dg (Hodge et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2018), such as a herniations associated with NPC assembly defects, overproliferation of the NE, accumulation of lipid droplets and defects in mitochondrial morphology, these defects are typically not associated with a first or second cell cycle arrest. Most NPC assembly mutants also do not delay in mitosis due to spindle/SPB duplication errors. Consistent with the idea that lethality is independent of NPC assembly, we found that transport of a variety of cargos into and out of the nucleus was unaffected by in brr6-Y100H mutants.

In fission yeast, Brr6p transiently localizes to the SPB during insertion into the NE (Tamm et al. 2011). Brr6p enrichment at the SPB has not been reported in budding yeast (Zhang et al. 2018), although if it is targeted to the SPB during insertion, which occurs during a brief window of the cell cycle, SPB localization may have been overlooked. Using structured-illumination microscopy (SIM), Ndc1p-mCherry can be visualized as a ring-like structure that is linked to SPB insertion into the NE (Chen et al. 2019). Brr6p-GFP co-localized with Ndc1p-mCherry in cells that contained duplicated side-by-side SPBs that just completed SPB duplication (Figure 1H).

Our data showing the Brr6p localizes to the SPB, in combination with our analysis of brr6-Y100H reporting a defect in nascent SPB insertion into the NE, supports a role for the protein at the SPB in budding yeast. Previous work on Brr6p showed interactions with NPC components as well as with reticulons involved in membrane curvature (Zhang et al. 2018). Its SPB localization and function in SPB insertion could be mediated by the NPC itself, which is found near the site of SPB insertion (Ruthnick et al. 2017) or interactions between Brr6p and NPC components, including the dual SPB and NPC component Ndc1p that binds to Brr6p (Zhang et al. 2018). Interestingly, we did not detect Brl1p at the SPB, and the equivalent mutation in its Brr6p-C-C domain had no effect on growth, indicating that the role for Brr6p at the SPB is specific to it and not a function shared with its paralog. At a mechanistic level, the function of Brr6p in SPB and/or NPC insertion into the NE is unknown, although our work showing defects in brr6-Y100H mutants suggests that the conserved Brr6p-C-C domain may play a key role. Formation of disulfide bonds and higher-order folding of this domain could facilitate the membrane curvature needed for SPB and NPC insertion. However, the Brr6p-C-C domain could also function to stabilize Brr6p protein. Consistent with this later idea, the brr6-Y100H allele is not viable when present in single copy; the temperature sensitive strains studied here contain two or four copies of the mutant gene. Future analysis of Brr6p binding partners will help address the role that it plays in both SPB and NPC insertion into the NE.

Methods

Request a detailed protocol

Yeast Strains and Plasmids

All strains are derivatives of W303 (ade2-1 trp1-1 leu2-3,112 ura3-1 his3-11,15 can1-100 RAD5+) and are listed in Reagents along with plasmids used in this study. Standard techniques were used for DNA and yeast manipulations. Tagging and deletion of genes was also done by PCR-based methods (Longtine et al. 1998; Sheff and Thorn 2004). ~700 bp of promoter, ~200 bp of terminator and the BRR6 open-reading frames were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA and cloned into pRS316 and pRS303-based plasmids (Sikorski and Hieter 1989). Mutations in BRR6were introduced using the QuikChange II Mutagenesis kit (Agilent) and confirmed by sequencing. Diploid yeast containing brr6∆::KANMX were transformed with pURA3-BRR6 (pSJ1587), sporulated and dissected to create strains used for plasmid-shuffle. pRS303-based plasmids were digested with NheI and integrated into the HIS3locus. To analyze phenotypes, cells were cultured overnight in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose) then plated to synthetic complete media lacking uracil (SC-Ura) or 5-fluoro-orotic acid (5-FOA) media and grown at the indicated temperatures. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and were added to YPD media in the following final amounts: 5 mM oleic acid, 5 µg/ml terbinafine, 2% benzyl alcohol or 10 µg/ml benomyl.

Cell Growth, Flow Cytometry and Confocal Imaging

Single colonies picked from 5-FOA plates were grown overnight to mid-log phase at 30°C in YPD, then kept at 30°C or shifted to 37°C for 4 h before harvesting and analysis. DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry in sonicated cells that had been fixed with 70% ethanol for 1 h at room temperature, treated with RNAse (Roche) and Proteinase K (Roche) for 2 h to overnight at 37°C and stained with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) in the dark at 4°C overnight. Samples were analyzed on a MACSQuant FACS Analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec) and data was displayed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). Spindle structure was assayed by live cell imaging on a Perkin Elmer Ultraview spinning disk confocal microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu EMCCD (C9100-13) optimized for speed, sensitivity and resolution. The microscope base was a Carl Zeiss Axio-observer equipped with an αPlan-Apochromat 100x 1.46NA oil immersion objective and a multiband dichroic reflecting 488 and 561 nm laser lines. GFP images were acquired with 488 nm excitation and 500-550 nm emission. mCherry images were acquired with 561 nm excitation and 580-650 nm emission. Data were acquired using the Perkin Elmer Volocity software with a z-spacing of 0.4 µm. Exposure time, laser power and camera gain were maintained at a constant level chosen to provide high signal-to-noise but avoid signal saturation for all samples. Images were processed using Image J (NIH). A representative z slice image is shown.

Structured-Illumination Microscopy

Cells were fixed for 15 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde (Ted Pella) in 100 mM sucrose, then washed two times in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. An aliquot of cells was placed on a glass slide and covered with a number 1.5 coverslip. SIM images were acquired with an Applied Precision OMX Blaze (GE Healthcare). A 60X 1.42 NA Plan Apo oil objective was used, and emission was collected onto two PCO Edge sCMOS cameras with each camera dedicated to one specific channel. For the two-color GFP/mCherry experiments, a 405/488/561/640 dichroic was used with 504- to 552-nm and 590- to 628-nm emission filters for GFP and mCherry, respectively. Images were taken using a 488-nm laser (for GFP) or a 561-nm laser (for mCherry), with alternating excitation. SIM reconstruction was performed with the Applied Precision software SoftWoRx with a Wiener filter of 0.001. Color alignment from different cameras in the radial plane was performed using the color alignment slide from GE Healthcare. In the axial direction, color alignment was performed using 100 nm TetraSpeck beads (Thermo FIsher). For image preparation, the SIM reconstructed images were scaled 2×2 with bilinear interpolation in ImageJ, then smoothed with a Gaussian blur of pixel radius 0.8.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

brr6-Y100H cells were grown overnight at 30°C and then shifted into a pre-warmed 37°C water bath for 4 h. Cells were quickly harvested and frozen on the Leica EM-Pact at ~2050 bar, transferred under liquid nitrogen into 2% osmium tetroxide/0.1% uranyl acetate/acetone, and transferred to the Leica AFS. The freeze substitution protocol was as follows: −90° for 16 h, raised 4°/h for 7 h, −60° for 19 h, raised 4°/h for 10 h, and −20° for 20 h. Samples were then removed from the AFS, placed in the refrigerator for 4 h, and then allowed to incubate at room temperature for 1 h. Samples went through three changes of acetone over 1 h and were removed from the planchettes. They were embedded in acetone/Epon mixtures to final 100% Epon over several days in a stepwise procedure as described (McDonald 1999). Sixty-nanometer serial thin sections were cut on a Leica UC6, stained with uranyl acetate and Sato’s lead and imaged on a FEI Tecnai Spirit.

Electron Tomography

Tomography was performed as previously described (Giddings et al. 2001). Dual-axis tilt series data were collected on a FEI Tecnai F20 at 200 kV. SerialEM (Mastronarde 2005) was used to acquire images every 1° over a ±60° range on a Gatan CCD camera with a pixel size of 1-1.5 nm. Images were aligned to compute tomograms using the IMOD software package (Mastronarde 1997). Nuclei spanned two to five serial sections, which were joined to produce the final volume shown. Ten nuclei were examined, including two nuclei with duplicated side-by-side SPBs, one nucleus with a metaphase spindle and another with an anaphase spindle. In the remaining six nuclei, monopolar spindles similar to those shown in the Figure were observed. The tomograms were displayed and modeled using the 3dmod program in IMOD, including labeling each microtubule, microtubule end and the SPB. Supplemental videos show example raw EM images and nuclear reconstructions from these images.

Reagents

Yeast Strains
Strain Genotype Figure
SLJ6805 MATa brr6∆::KANMX pURA3-BRR6 Figure 1B
SLJ9382 MATa brr6∆::KANMX his3::BRR6-HIS3MX pURA3-BRR6 ADE2 LYS2 Figure 1C
SLJ9383 MATa brr6∆::KANMX his3::brr6-Y100H-HIS3MX pURA3-BRR6 ADE2 LYS2 Figure 1C
SLJ6994 MATa brr6Δ::KANMX his3::BRR6-HIS3 trp1::GFP-TUB1-TRP1 pLEU2-SPC42-mCherry-HIS3MX ADE2 Figure 1D-F
SLJ6995 MATa brr6Δ::KANMX his3::brr6-Y100H-HIS3 trp1::GFP-TUB1-TRP1 pLEU2-SPC42-mCherry-HIS3MX ADE2 Figure 1D-F
SLJ6832 MATa brr6∆::KANMX his3::brr6-Y100H-HIS3 Figure 1G
SLJ10077 MATa BRR6-GFP-HIS3MX NDC1-mCherry-KANMX Figure 1H
Plasmids
Number Name Source
pSJ1587 pRS316-BRR6 this study
pSJ1377 pRS303-BRR6 this study
pSJ1431 pRS303-brr6-Y100H this study
pSJ906 pRS315-SPC42-mCherry-HIS3MX Rong Li Lab

Acknowledgments

We thank Melainia McClain and Fengli Guo for EM assistance and Mark Winey, Jay Unruh, Brian Slaughter and members of the Jaspersen lab for helpful suggestions and comments on the manuscript. Original data underlying this manuscript can be downloaded from the Stowers Original Data Repository at http://www.stowers.org/research/publications/libpb-1649.

References

Casey AK, Dawson TR, Chen J, Friederichs JM, Jaspersen SL, Wente SR. 2012. Integrity and function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body depends on connections between the membrane proteins Ndc1, Rtn1, and Yop1. Genetics 192: 441-55.
PubMed
Chen J, Smoyer CJ, Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Jaspersen SL. 2014. The SUN protein Mps3 controls Ndc1 distribution and function on the nuclear membrane. J Cell Biol 204: 523-39.
PubMed
Chen J, Gardner JM, Yu Z, Smith SE, McKinney S, Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Jaspersen SL. 2019. Yeast centrosome components form a noncanonical LINC complex at the nuclear envelope insertion site. J Cell Biol 218: 1478-1490.
PubMed
Chial HJ, Rout MP, Giddings TH, Winey M. 1998. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ndc1p is a shared component of nuclear pore complexes and spindle pole bodies. J Cell Biol 143: 1789-800.
PubMed
de Bruyn Kops A, Guthrie C. 2001. An essential nuclear envelope integral membrane protein, Brr6p, required for nuclear transport. EMBO J 20: 4183-93.
PubMed
de Bruyn Kops A, Burke JE, Guthrie C. 2018. Brr6 plays a role in gene recruitment and transcriptional regulation at the nuclear envelope. Mol Biol Cell 29: 2578-2590.
PubMed
Giddings TH Jr, O'Toole ET, Morphew M, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR, Winey M. 2001. Using rapid freeze and freeze-substitution for the preparation of yeast cells for electron microscopy and three-dimensional analysis. Methods Cell Biol 67: 27-42.
PubMed
Heath IB. 1980. Variant mitoses in lower eukaryotes: indicators of the evolution of mitosis. Int Rev Cytol 64: 1-80.
PubMed
Hodge CA, Choudhary V, Wolyniak MJ, Scarcelli JJ, Schneiter R, Cole CN. 2010. Integral membrane proteins Brr6 and Apq12 link assembly of the nuclear pore complex to lipid homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci 123: 141-51.
PubMed
Jaspersen SL. 2021. Anatomy of the fungal microtubule organizing center, the spindle pole body. Curr Opin Struct Biol 66: 22-31.
PubMed
Lone MA, Atkinson AE, Hodge CA, Cottier S, Martínez-Montañés F, Maithel S, Mène-Saffrané L, Cole CN, Schneiter R. 2015. Yeast Integral Membrane Proteins Apq12, Brl1, and Brr6 Form a Complex Important for Regulation of Membrane Homeostasis and Nuclear Pore Complex Biogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 14: 1217-27.
PubMed
Longtine MS, McKenzie A 3rd, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953-61.
PubMed
Makarova M, Oliferenko S. 2016. Mixing and matching nuclear envelope remodeling and spindle assembly strategies in the evolution of mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 41: 43-50.
PubMed
Mastronarde DN. 1997. Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. J Struct Biol 120: 343-52.
PubMed
McDonald K. 1999. High-pressure freezing for preservation of high resolution fine structure and antigenicity for immunolabeling. Methods Mol Biol 117: 77-97.
PubMed
Rüthnick D, Neuner A, Dietrich F, Kirrmaier D, Engel U, Knop M, Schiebel E. 2017. Characterization of spindle pole body duplication reveals a regulatory role for nuclear pore complexes. J Cell Biol 216: 2425-2442.
PubMed
Rüthnick D, Schiebel E. 2018. Duplication and Nuclear Envelope Insertion of the Yeast Microtubule Organizing Centre, the Spindle Pole Body. Cells 7: 42.
PubMed
Sheff MA, Thorn KS. 2004. Optimized cassettes for fluorescent protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 21: 661-70.
PubMed
Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19-27.
PubMed
Tamm T, Grallert A, Grossman EP, Alvarez-Tabares I, Stevens FE, Hagan IM. 2011. Brr6 drives the Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle pole body nuclear envelope insertion/extrusion cycle. J Cell Biol 195: 467-84.
PubMed
Witkin KL, Friederichs JM, Cohen-Fix O, Jaspersen SL. 2010. Changes in the nuclear envelope environment affect spindle pole body duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 186: 867-83.
PubMed
Zhang W, Neuner A, Rüthnick D, Sachsenheimer T, Lüchtenborg C, Brügger B, Schiebel E. 2018. Brr6 and Brl1 locate to nuclear pore complex assembly sites to promote their biogenesis. J Cell Biol 217: 877-894.
PubMed

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and by NIH NIGMS under R01GM121443 (to S.L.J.).

Author Contributions

Jennifer M Gardner: Formal analysis, Writing - review and editing, Investigation
Eileen O'Toole: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - review and editing
Sue L Jaspersen: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing, Supervision.

Reviewed By

Anonymous

History

Received: August 9, 2021
Revision received: September 13, 2021
Accepted: September 13, 2021
Published: September 16, 2021

Copyright

© 2021 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Gardner, JM; O'Toole, E; Jaspersen, SL (2021). A mutation in budding yeast BRR6 affecting nuclear envelope insertion of the spindle pole body. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000463.
Download: RIS BibTeX
microPublication Biology is published by
1200 E. California Blvd. MC 1-43 Pasadena, CA 91125
The microPublication project is supported by
The National Institute of Health -- Grant #: 1U01LM012672-01
microPublication Biology:ISSN: 2578-9430